Abstract
The curative potential of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with low dose total body irradiation (TBI) based conditionings relies exclusively upon a graft-versus-myeloma effect through donor lymphocytes. Thus, low tumor burden and well-controlled disease at transplant could play a pivotal role. Forty-four consecutive patients with myeloma were treated at 4 different Institutions. Thirty newly diagnosed patients (group A) received a planned autologous transplant with melphalan 200 mg/m2 followed by 200 cGy TBI and allogeneic G-CSF mobilized PBSC infusions from HLA identical siblings. Median time from diagnosis to HCT was 9 months (range, 5–46). At allografting, 7 (23%) patients were in complete remission (CR), 17 (57%) in partial response (PR) and 6 (20%) had refractory disease. The remaining 14 patients received fludarabine 90 mg/m2 and 200 cGy TBI followed by allogeneic PBSC from HLA identical siblings as salvage therapy (group B) after a median of at least 2 lines of previous chemotherapy (range, 2–5); all patients, except one, had received 2 autologous transplants. Patients in group B underwent allografting at a median of 37 months (range, 15–105) from diagnosis; 7 (50%) were in PR, 3 (21%) had refractory disease and 4 (28%) were in overt progression. Post-grafting immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine and micophenolate mofetil in both groups. All patients readely engrafted with median donor T cell chimerism of 97% (range, 55–100%) at day 100. Overall, 64% (28/44) and 43% (19/44) patients developed acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic clinical extensive GVHD, respectively. There were no significant differences in engraftment kinetics and incidence of GVHD between the 2 groups. After a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 2–50) in group A and 19 months (range, 2–48) in group B, treatment related mortality was 23% among patients who received HCT earlier (group A) and 21% among those who were treated later (group B) in the disease course. Overall survival was 74% and 43% in group A and B, respectively. Disease responses are described in the table.
. | n . | complete remission . | partial response . | stable disease . | progression . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disease response | |||||
Group A | 30 | 17 | 6 | 7 | 0 |
Group B | 14 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 |
p value | – | 0.0001 | 0.08 | 0.3 | <0.0001 |
. | n . | complete remission . | partial response . | stable disease . | progression . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disease response | |||||
Group A | 30 | 17 | 6 | 7 | 0 |
Group B | 14 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 |
p value | – | 0.0001 | 0.08 | 0.3 | <0.0001 |
Among patients in group A, 4 relapsed after obtaining CR. Three of them received donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI): 1 achieved CR, 1 PR and 1 had stable disease. Of the 14 patients in group B, 5 received DLI because of relapse/disease progression: 2 obtained PR, and 3 progressed. In conclusion, these findings indicate that graft-versus-myeloma effect appears more effective if HCT is performed earlier after diagnosis in patients with low tumor burden.
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal