Role of the intracellular domains of GPIb in controlling the adhesive properties of the platelet GPIb/V/IX complex

Platelets play an essential role in hemostasis by adhering to injured blood vessels where they become activated and aggregate.1 The glycoprotein (GP) Ib/V/IX receptor mediates the initial adhesion of platelets by binding to von Willebrand factor (VWF) exposed on the subendothelium of the damaged vessel wall.2 This interaction is capable of withstanding high shear forces, which is necessary for its function of tethering platelets in rapidly flowing blood.3 4 

The GPIb/V/IX receptor belongs to the leucine-rich repeat glycoproteins and is composed of GPIbα, disulfide linked to GPIbβ to form GPIb, which is noncovalently associated with GPIX and GPV on the platelet surface.5-7 The GPIbα (610 amino acids) adhesive subunit binds to VWF through its 45-kd globular extracellular domain,8,9 while its 96-residue cytoplasmic domain binds to filamin-1 (or ABP-280) through the 557-579 region10,11and to adaptor protein 14.3.3ζ through the 605-610 region.12,13 These interactions serve to anchor the receptor to the cytoskeleton, regulate VWF-dependent adhesion under flow, and transduce signals necessary for αIIbβ3 integrin activation.14-18 The roles of the other subunits are less well established apart from the requirement for GPIbβ and GPIX for correct processing and surface expression of the complex.19,20 These 2 subunits have similar extracellular sequences but differ in their intracellular domains of 34 and 6 residues, respectively. The GPIbβ intracellular serine at position 166 can be phosphorylated by a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)–dependent kinase (PKA), a process thought to facilitate interaction with 14.3.3ζ.13,21,22 More recently, calmodulin has been proposed as a third intracellular partner of GPIb/V/IX with binding sites identified in GPIbβ and GPV.23 

In a previous report, we described a monoclonal antibody (MoAb) RAM.1 against the GPIbβ extracellular domain that inhibited VWF-mediated adhesion of platelets and GPIb/V/IX-transfected K562 cells under flow.24 The mechanism controlling this effect of RAM.1 was unknown but suggested a role of GPIbβ in regulating GPIb/V/IX-dependent adhesion to VWF. In the present study, we tested the possibility that the inhibition of the GPIb–VWF interaction by RAM.1 was conveyed by the GPIb intracellular domain. Studies of adhesion to immobilized VWF in a flow system were performed using K562 and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with GPIb/(V)/IX containing mutations and deletions in the intracellular domains of GPIbβ and GPIbα. The participation of cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of GPIbβ was also evaluated. Evidence was found that efficient cell tethering and sensitivity to inhibition by RAM.1 require an intact serine at position 166 of GPIbβ and are regulated by the level of phosphorylation. Moreover, deletions of the GPIbα intracellular region caused loss of the effect of RAM.1, suggesting a functional communication between the GPIbα and GPIbβ subunits.

Cell culture reagents were from Life Technologies GIBCO BRL (Cergy-Pontoise, France) except for FuGene transfection reagent (Roche Diagnostic, Meylan, France), methotrexate (France Biochem, Meudon, France), and Zeocin (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). Forskolin, prostaglandins E1 (PGE₁) and I2 (PGI₂), normal goat serum (NGS), fatty acid–free human serum albumin (HSA), bovine serum albumin (BSA), and protein G–sepharose were from Sigma Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Apyrase was purified from potatoes as previously described.25 Human VWF and bovine VWF were prepared according to published procedures.15,26 The cAMP(¹²⁵I) assay kit and phosphorus-32 ([³²P]PO₄) were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala, Sweden). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–conjugated goat anti–mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) and FITC-conjugated goat F(ab')₂ fragments anti–rat IgG were from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA). Purified rat IgG1 was from Pharmingen (Le Pont de Claix, France) and the murine MoAb SZ2 against human GPIbα was from Immunotech (Marseille, France). Different MoAbs were produced in our laboratory as IgG1, κ isotype. Mouse MoAbs ALMA.12 and ALMA.19 are directed against human GPIbα, ALMA.16 against human GPIX, and V.1 against human GPV. RAM.1 is a rat MoAb directed against mouse and human GPIbβ.24 Complete protease inhibitor cocktail and calpain inhibitor 1 were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany).

Human platelets were isolated from acid-citrate-dextrose anticoagulated blood obtained from aspirin-free healthy volunteers and washed by sequential centrifugation in Tyrode buffer containing 5 mM HEPES (N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′-2-ethanesulfonic acid), pH 7.35, 0.35% HSA, and 0.5 μM PGI₂.25 The platelets were finally resuspended at 3 × 10⁵platelets/μL in the same buffer lacking PGI₂ and containing 0.04 U/mL apyrase.

CHO cell lines expressing the GPIb/IX complex with deletions of the GPIbα intracellular domain have been reported previously.27,28 K562 cell lines expressing the GPIb/V/IX complex with deletions of the GPIbα intracellular domain (Δ518-610, Δ535-568, Δ569-610) were obtained by cotransfection of plasmids coding for wild-type GPIbβ, GPIX, and GPV essentially as described earlier.15,27 To obtain a cell line containing a Ser166Gly mutation of GPIbβ, K562 cells were transfected with a pSVZeo plasmid containing GPV cDNA and pDX expression plasmids individually containing cDNAs for GPIbα, GPIX, and mutated GPIbβ with glycine at position 166 using the U-DNA Mutagenesis kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany).29 GPIbβ primers¹²⁴¹CAGCGGGTCGGTCAGACCCAGCCGGGCTGC¹²¹²and¹²¹²GCAGCCCGGCTGGGTCTGACCGACCCGCTG¹²⁴¹containing the mutation (underlined) were each annealed with full-length GPIbβ inserted into the EcoRI sites of M13. M13 single- and second-strand DNA synthesis was performed using T4 ligase and polymerase. After sequencing, the mutated GPIbβ was reinserted into pDX. CHO-GPIb/IX cells were cultured in minimum essential medium (αMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), PSG mix (100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine), and 400 μg/mL G418. K562-GPIb/V/IX cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS, PSG mix, and 200 μg/mL Zeocin.

Transfected cells (1.5 × 10⁵ in 0.5 mL) or platelets (9 × 10⁷ in 0.5 mL) were incubated at 37°C with forskolin (10 μM or 50 μM) for 1 hour or with adrenaline (10 μM) or PGE₁ (10 μM) for 5 minutes. Treatment was stopped by adding 50 μL of ice-cold 6 N perchloric acid and cAMP was isolated from the supernatant by extraction with a mixture of trioctylamine and freon (28/22 vol/vol). Following centrifugation at 12 000 rpm for 4 minutes at 4°C, the upper aqueous phase was recovered and lyophilized. The dry residue was dissolved and cAMP was quantified with a commercial cAMP(¹²⁵I) assay kit.

K562-GPIb/V/IX, K562-GPIb(βSer166Gly)/V/IX cells (10⁶ cells/mL), and washed human platelets (10⁹/mL) in Tyrode buffer lacking PO₄ and PGI₂ were labeled for either 15 minutes with 100 μCi/mL (3.7 MBq) [³²P]PO₄ (K562 cells) or one hour with 0.2 mCi/mL (7.4 MBq) [³²P]PO₄in the presence of 0.04 U/mL apyrase (platelets) at 37°C. After 2 washes, cells were first incubated with 10 μg/mL of RAM.1 or its isotypic control rat IgG1 for 30 minutes and then treated with 10 μM PGE₁ or 10 μM forskolin for 10 minutes at 37°C. Following centrifugation, platelets were lysed by addition of 3 N perchloric acid and K562 cells by incubation with a ice-cold Triton X-100 lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors, 50 mM NaF, and 2.5 mM Na₃VO₄ for 20 minutes. After centrifugation at 15 000 rpm, proteins were immunoprecipitated by RAM.1 coupled to protein G–sepharose for 2 hours. Proteins were separated on a 7.5% to 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel. The dried gel was exposed for autoradiography or analyzed in a phosphoimager system (BioRad, Hercules, CA).

K562 or CHO cells (2 × 10⁵ in 100 μL) were incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with purified IgG (10 μg/mL) in FMF buffer (RPMI medium, 5% NGS, 0.2% sodium azide). After centrifugation at 1200 rpm, the cells were resuspended in buffer containing a 100-fold dilution of FITC-conjugated goat F(ab′)₂ anti–rat IgG or FITC-conjugated goat IgG anti–mouse IgG for 30 minutes at 4°C. Analyses were performed on 10 000 cells in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Rungis, France).

Adhesion of cells under flow conditions was investigated according to Cranmer et al,15 using glass microcapillary tubes (Vitro Dynamics, Mountain Lakes, NJ) coated overnight at 4°C in a humid chamber with either 1% HSA or 25 μg/mL bovine or human VWF in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and postcoated for one hour at room temperature with 1% HSA. Cells (1 × 10⁶/mL) or platelets (3 × 10⁸/mL) in Tyrode buffer containing 2 mM EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) were perfused through the capillaries at a shear rate of 150 s^-1 for 10 minutes. The effects of MoAbs (10 μg/mL) were tested by preincubation with the cells for 10 minutes at room temperature. Cell adhesion was visualized at 10-fold magnification by video microscopy (Leica DMIRB; Leica Microsystems SA, Wetzlar, Germany). The images were recorded for subsequent analysis on an AV disc recorder WDR 200 (Matsushita Electric Industrial, Osaka, Japan). Under these conditions, cells tethered and rolled over the surface. The number of adherent rolling cells counted in fields of 1 mm² progressively accumulated from zero to a maximum that the matrix concentration can support. EDTA was included as a standard condition for comparison between cell types, as it is problematic to specifically inhibit endogenous integrins in CHO cells due to lack of appropriate antibodies or antagonists. Adhesion of K562-GPIb/V/IX cells was identical in the presence or absence of EDTA, in keeping with the lack of endogenous integrins able to bind VWF. In some studies the microcapillary tube was perfused with cell-free buffer at the end of a 5-minute perfusion at 75 s^-1 and the shear rate was increased incrementally to 150 s^-1, 300 s^-1, 750 s^-1, 1500 s^-1, 3000 s^-1, and 6000 s^-1. At each shear rate the field was taped for 2 minutes and the number of adherent cells was quantitated off-line.

The statistical significance of differences between means was evaluated using the Student t test for paired samples andP values of less than .05 were considered to be significant. Variations of means were calculated as the standard deviation.

RAM.1 inhibited adhesion of K562-GPIb/V/IX cells to bovine VWF under flow (Figure 1A) and also decreased adhesion of platelets and CHO-GPIb/IX cells by 50% (Figure 1B-C). When experiments were performed with human VWF, fewer platelets and transfected cells were captured than on bovine VWF,15 and pretreatment with RAM.1 strongly inhibited or abolished adhesion. These results obtained with different cells and VWF matrixes supported our original proposal that RAM.1-occupied GPIbβ down-regulates GPIbα–VWF interactions.

The role of the GPIbβ intracellular domain in mediating the effect of RAM.1 was assessed in experiments using cells expressing GPIb/V/IX with a GPIbβ(Ser166Gly) mutation (K562-GPIb(βSer166Gly)/V/IX cells). Ser166 was selected because of its reported phosphorylation by a cAMP-dependent kinase,21a process favoring 14.3.3ζ binding.22 Adhesion of K562-GPIb(βSer166Gly) cells to bovine or human VWF was approximately 50% less than that of cells containing the wild-type complex (P < .05) (Figure 2). Interestingly, adhesion of K562-GPIb(βSer166Gly)/V/IX cells was not modified by RAM.1 treatment. A similar decrease in adhesion was observed when the GPIbβ(Ser166Gly) mutation was introduced into CHO-GPIb/IX cells (data not shown).

To evaluate the effect of the mutation on adhesion at high shear, K562-GPIb/V/IX cells were preadhered at low shear (75 s^-1) and then exposed to incremental increases in shear rates (Figure3). Cells with the GPIbβ(Ser166Gly) mutation were more easily detached than wild-type cells, such that approximately 55% of mutant cells were detached at 6000 s^-1 compared with only 20% of wild-type cells. Defective adhesion under static or flow conditions was not due to lower levels of GPIbβ as the 2 cell lines displayed comparable surface expression of the 4 subunits (Figure 4A, upper panels).

Since results for the GPIbβ(Ser166Gly) mutant cells indicated that lack of GPIbβ phosphorylation decreased adhesion efficiency, the consequences of increased phosphorylation were investigated by treating K562 cells expressing the wild-type or mutated complex with forskolin or PGE₁. A 6-fold increase in cAMP levels using 50 μM forskolin and a 2-fold increase using 10 μM forskolin or PGE₁ was observed in both cell lines (Figure 4B), whereas treatment with either reagent had no effect on surface expression of GPIb/V/IX as confirmed by fluorescence activated cell sorting (Figure 4A).

The level of GPIbβ phosphorylation was evaluated by ³²P incorporation in platelets and K562-GPIb/V/IX cells. At a resting state, only a very low level of phosphorylation was observed in both platelets and cell lines (Figure 5). Treatment with forskolin or PGE₁ increased phosphorylation of GPIbβ in platelets and cells expressing the wild-type complex and this effect was reversed by treatment with RAM.1. GPIbβ was not phosphorylated in cells expressing the Ser166Gly mutation.

Adhesion on VWF of platelets (Figure 6), and of cells transfected with the wild-type complex (Figures7 and 8), was increased following treatment with forskolin or PGE₁ compared with untreated cells. Adhesion of platelets was increased to a similar extent with either forskolin or PGE₁. Cells incubated with the higher concentration of forskolin adhered more efficiently (70%-100% increase,P < .01) than those incubated with the lower concentration of forskolin or with PGE₁(P < .05). In contrast, forskolin or PGE₁treatment did not influence adhesion of cells expressing the GPIbβ(Ser166Gly) mutation, despite identical rises in cAMP (Figures4B, 7, and 8). The effect of forskolin was completely abolished when K562-GPIb/V/IX cells were first treated with RAM.1 (P < .01) and adhesion levels were identical to those of cells treated with RAM.1 in the absence of forskolin (Figure7B).

The finding of a regulatory role of the GPIbβ intracellular domain and its close proximity to the GPIbα subunit suggested the possible involvement of the GPIbα intracellular domain in RAM.1 inhibition. Hence, flow studies were carried out using cells containing deletions of the entire (Δ518-610), central (Δ535-568), or C-terminal (Δ569-610) portion of the GPIbα intracellular domain. All 3 cell lines adhered with comparable efficiency and displayed kinetics similar to those of cells expressing the normal complex (Figure 9), in agreement with results for transfected CHO cells.15 Contrary to K562 cells expressing the wild-type GPIb/V/IX complex, the 3 cell lines containing GPIbα deletions did not exhibit any decrease in adhesion in the presence of RAM.1. This lack of sensitivity to RAM.1 was also observed in CHO-GPIb/IX cells expressing the same deletions (Figure10).

In an attempt to identify discrete residues required for transmission of the inhibitory effect of RAM.1, experiments were performed using cells containing progressive 11-12 amino acid deletions in the 535 to 590 region of GPIbα. As previously reported,11comparable levels of adhesion were observed for control cells and all cell lines expressing deletions (Figure 10). Pretreatment of these cells with RAM.1 did not significantly influence their kinetics and levels of adhesion, with the exception of the Δ569-579 clone, which displayed 50% lower adhesion and behaved similarly to cells containing the wild-type complex. These results indicate that a major portion of the intracellular domain of GPIbα is required to convey the inhibitory signal triggered by RAM.1.

This study supports a functional role of GPIbβ and the involvement of its intracellular domain in regulating GPIbα-dependent adhesion to VWF. Experiments with the MoAb RAM.1 directed against the extracellular domain of GPIbβ and with cell lines expressing the GPIb/V/IX complex containing mutations in the intracellular domain of GPIbβ or GPIbα provided evidence for (1) a regulatory role of GPIbβ, which is dependent on the degree of phosphorylation of Ser166 in the intracellular domain and (2) cross-talk between GPIbβ and GPIbα, requiring an intact GPIbα intracellular domain.

Our original observation that RAM.1 inhibited platelet VWF binding, VWF-induced aggregation, and adhesion to a VWF matrix was unexpected because GPIbα was viewed as the only subunit capable of mediating platelet interactions with VWF. This study confirms and extends our previous results by demonstrating an effect of RAM.1 independent of the cell type, leading to inhibition of the adhesion of not only platelets but also K562-GPIb/V/IX– and CHO-GPIb/IX–transfected cells. A further observation is that RAM.1 was a more efficient inhibitor when experiments were carried out using a human VWF matrix (70%-80% inhibition) rather than bovine VWF (50% inhibition), in keeping with the lower capturing efficiency of the human matrix.15These results did not yet clarify the roles played by each subunit of the GPIb/V/IX complex and which domains were involved in conveying the negative signal of RAM.1.

Since GPIbβ has no direct VWF binding properties, we hypothesized that RAM.1 could act indirectly by modifying GPIbα-dependent adhesion. Intracellular regulation of GPIbα-dependent binding has been recently suggested in relation to its association with the cytoskeleton or adaptor proteins.15,28,31 A possible mechanism that was tested in this study was that GPIbβ could cooperate with GPIbα intracellularly. Reports of binding sites for the dimeric 14.3.3ζ adaptor protein on the GPIbα (amino acid [aa] 605-610) and GPIbβ (aa 160-175) intracellular domains suggested a putative link between the 2 subunits.12,13 The 14.3.3ζ binding site on GPIbβ includes a serine at position 166, a residue phosphorylated by a cAMP-dependent mechanism.21Interestingly, we found that blocking GPIbβ Ser166 phosphorylation with a glycine substitution decreased cell adhesion to VWF and the remaining adhesion was unaffected by treatment with RAM.1. This indicated that optimal adhesion and sensitivity to RAM.1 both required phosphorylation at position 166 of GPIbβ. It also suggested that a basal level of adhesion provided by GPIbα could be independent of its association with GPIbβ. Confirmation of the latter in a cellular system would require testing cells lacking the whole GPIbβ subunit. In the absence of GPIbβ, levels of GPIbα surface expression are, however, too low in our experience to allow sufficient cell attachment and a meaningful comparison.

One possible explanation for the decreased adhesion of the GPIb(βSer166Gly) mutant could relate to defective 14.3.3 binding. However, we observed normal GPIb/IX-14.3.3ζ coprecipitation in the GPIbβ(Ser166Gly) cell line (P.M., unpublished results, March 2002) and similar replacement of Ser166 by alanine only reduced interaction with 14.3.3ζ in a 2-hybrid system by 20% to 40%.30 Furthermore, several deletions of GPIbα that completely prevented 14.3.3 binding did not modify adhesion as compared with cells expressing the wild-type complex.31 On the other hand, increasing GPIbβ Ser166 phosphorylation has been reported to enhance binding of GPIbβ to 14.3.3ζ. In this study, treatment of platelets, CHO cells, or K562 cells expressing GPIb/(V)/IX with forskolin or PGE₁ significantly increased phosphorylation of GPIbβ and adhesion to VWF, demonstrating the regulatory importance of this phosphorylated residue. RAM.1 treatment reversed these effects, suggesting that sensitivity to RAM.1 correlates with the degree of GPIbβ Ser166 phosphorylation. In these conditions, phosphorylation of GPIbβ seems to provide optimal initial interaction between GPIb/V/IX and VWF.

These results would appear to contradict an earlier report of decreased shear-induced aggregation of platelets treated with PGI₂, another PKA activator,22 or a recently published report of decreased VWF-dependent adhesion of platelets and CHO-GPIb/IX treated with forskolin.32 Shear-induced aggregation results from both GPIb–VWF interaction and αIIbβ3 integrin activation, which is down-regulated by agents raising cAMP. We examined adhesion of GPIb/(V)/IX-transfected cells under conditions independent of integrin mobilization. In the more recent study, adhesion of platelets (but not that of GPIb/IX-transfected cells) was performed in the presence of integrin blockade. An important difference relates to the level of GPIbβ phosphorylation observed in platelets and GPIb/IX-transfected cells. Bodnar et al32 using a phosphopeptide-specific antibody concluded on a high level of GPIbβ phosphorylation in platelets and full phosphorylation in CHO-GPIb/IX cells at a resting state and proposed that this was responsible for the low adhesion efficiency of the CHO-GPIb/IX cells. It is our observation and that of other groups that GPIb/(V)/IX-transfected cells have acquired the ability to efficiently bind and/or adhere to VWF.14,15 33 In this study we observed, using direct measurement of ³²P incorporation, only a very low level of GPIbβ phosphorylation in resting platelets, K562-GPIb/V/IX–transfected cells (Figure 5), and CHO-GPIb/IX cells (data not shown), and that all 3 cells have an intrinsic capacity to bind VWF and adhere under flow conditions, which is further enhanced by PGE₁ or forskolin treatment.

The results obtained with RAM.1 and mutant GPIbβ suggested a model whereby direct or indirect interaction of the GPIbβ intracellular domain with GPIbα would modulate VWF-dependent adhesion. Studies of cells expressing complete or partial deletions of the GPIbα intracellular sequence showed that this domain was essential to sustain RAM.1 inhibition and pointed to the existence of cross-talk between the GPIbα and GPIbβ intracellular domains. This was indicated by the normal levels of adhesion of all cell lines containing mutant receptors, which became completely resistant to inhibition by RAM.1 despite normal binding of the MoAb. Only one construct behaved like the wild-type sequence, the GPIbαΔ569-579 deletion. Hence, no discrete subdomain could be pinpointed for the effect of RAM.1, which appears to require most of the intracellular sequence of GPIbα.

The normal adhesion and absence of sensitivity to RAM.1 of cells lacking the intracellular region of GPIbα suggest that this domain could negatively control VWF-dependent adhesion. According to this model, an increase in cAMP would relieve the control by phosphorylating GPIbβ Ser166. Another possibility is that cAMP could phosphorylate the GPIbα intracellular domain that contains 8 threonine and 10 serine residues. To date only Ser609 at the C-terminal end of GPIbα has been found to be phosphorylated in platelets under resting conditions and was proposed to bind 14.3.3ζ and regulate platelet adhesion.34 Several deletions of GPIbα that prevent RAM.1 inhibition such as GPIbαΔ557-568 and Δ535-568 have also been reported to prevent interaction with filamin-1,28suggesting that it could be involved in transmitting the effect of RAM.1. However, other deletions that preserve normal filamin-1 binding, such as GPIbαΔ591-610, Δ535-545, Δ546-556, and Δ580-590, also fail to exhibit inhibition by RAM.1. Moreover, the fact that filamin-1 interacts with the GPIbα intracellular region but not with GPIbβ does not support a role of filamin as a functional switch between the 2 subunits.

As stated earlier, 14.3.3ζ binds to and could bridge the GPIbα and GPIbβ subunits. However, mutations of GPIbβ Ser166 and deletions in the 535-568 region of GPIbα, both preserving 14.3.3ζ binding,31 were refractory to the effect of RAM.1, which does not favor involvement of the adaptor protein. Calmodulin has recently been identified as a third intracellular binding partner of the GPIb/V/IX complex,23 but its apparent lack of interaction with GPIbα would exclude a role in bridging to the GPIbβ subunit.

The exact mechanism by which RAM.1 regulates the adhesive properties of GPIbα is still not clear but could involve decreases in affinity or avidity for VWF. Gain-of-function mutations within the cysteine loops in platelet-type von Willebrand disease (GPIbαGly233Val, Met239Val) suggest that GPIbα could exist in at least 2 conformational states (low and high affinity).35 Furthermore, an intramolecular interaction between the 1-81 and 201-268 regions of resting GPIbα was recently identified and could be destroyed by addition of ristocetin or application of shear.36 The recently published crystal structure of the GPIbα N-terminal domain is compatible with regulated exposure of the VWF binding site by an unmasking mechanism.37,38 This raises the possibility of an inside-out regulation of the adhesive properties of GPIbα as has been documented for other adhesive receptors. For example, deletions within the intracellular domain of selectins affect cell rolling and attachment on their counterreceptors.39 Intracellular deletions in the α or β subunits of integrin heterodimers can negatively or positively influence their adhesive properties and binding affinity.40 Opposite effects of RAM.1 treatment or GPIbβ phosphorylation on VWF binding could potentially result in similar opening or closure of a GPIbα binding cavity.

The authors thank G. Kauffenstein for advice in measurement of intracellular cAMP and J. Mulvihill for correcting the English of the manuscript.