Abstract
Backgrounds and aims
Prevention and prompt treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFI) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients can improve overall survival not only by reducing infection-related mortality but also allowing to comply induction regimens on time.
The aim of the study was to estimate efficacy and feasibility of primary antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole (PSZ) in patients affected by acute myeloid leukemia receiving front-line chemotherapy and to optimize our clinical practice.
Materials and methods
From January 2013 to May 2014, 28 AML patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy and potentially eligible for bone marrow transplantation in our institute received PSZ prophylaxis for IFI. All patients received a fludarabine, cytarabine and idarubicin containing regimen as first line treatment. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of PSZ prophylaxis; to detect factors affecting drug exposure we analyzed each period of hospitalization as a single independent event.
PSZ was given at the standard dose of 200 mg for 3 times/day, concurrently with a fat snack or with at least 100 ml of an acidic drink.
Because of unpredictable absorption rates PSZ serum levels (TDM) were assessed routinely according to a validated high-performance liquid chromato-graphic (HPLC) method as described.
A comparison with an historical cohort with similar features who had received fluconazole (FLC) prophylaxis was made. The use of empirical or targeted antifungal therapies and the incidence of IFI were compared.
Results and discussion
PSZ showed a good tolerability profile with no serious adverse events clearly related to prophylaxis occurring.
A median number of 2 TDM for each period of hospitalization was performed (range 2-5). The achievement of a plasmatic PSZ concentration > 0,7 mcg/mL is considered optimal for prophylaxis efficacy; in 30/47 (64%) episodes of hospitalization and treatment, with at least two TDM, the threshold PSZ serum concentration was reached, with stable plasmatic levels. Median PSZ plasmatic value at first assessment was 0.89 mcg/mL (range 0.1-3.3).
Table 1 summarizes patients features and factors that might affect PSZ plasma concentrations. The strongest negative factors affecting PSZ absorption are the discontinuation of prophylaxis and the concomitant assumption of proton pump inhibitors since their negative impact is shown both in univariate and multivariate analysis.
No proven IFI were observed in our cohort with only one probable IFI occurring in a patient with refractory disease who did not reach adequate serum PSZ concentration.
Table 2 summarizes the comparison with our historical cohort. The risk of experiencing IFI (proven or probable) during AML treatment is significantly higher in the FLC cohort (HR: 9.488, CI: 1,404 - 64,122). Moreover, the use of targeted or empirical antifungal therapies had been significantly higher in FLC cohort (HR: 2.7, CI: 1,212 - 6,050).
Our clinical experience confirms the utility and cost-effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with PSZ in AML patients receiving intensive treatment.
. | . | Reached plasmatic concentration threshold (%) . | p (univariate) . | p (multivariate) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
All Hospitalizations | 30/47 (64) | - | - | |
Sex | Male | 17/23 (74) | 0.227 | - |
Female | 13/24 (54) | |||
Disease Status | Active Disease | 13/27 (57) | 0.014 | 0.156 |
Complete Response | 17/20 (85) | |||
Mucositis | None or Grade 1 | 25/32 (78) | 0.008 | 0.228 |
Grade >=2 | 5/15 (33) | |||
Age | <=45 years | 12/21 (57) | 0.543 | - |
>45 years | 18/26 (69) | |||
Concomitant PPI | No | 28/36 (78) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Yes | 2/11 (18) | |||
Concomitant Ranitidine | No | 26/42 (62) | 0.640 | - |
No | 4/5 (80) | |||
Concomitant Levofloxacine prophylaxis | Yes | 27/39 (69) | 0.118 | 0.042 |
No | 3/8 (38) | |||
Prophylaxis Discontinuation | Never | 27/36 (75) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
At least for 2 dd | 3/11 (27) | |||
Infectious Complications | None | 8/11 (73) | 0.722 | - |
At least one episode | 22/36 (61) | |||
PSZ Assumption with | Fat snack | 5/11 (46) | 0.153 | 0.150 |
Acidic drink | 25/35 (71) |
. | . | Reached plasmatic concentration threshold (%) . | p (univariate) . | p (multivariate) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
All Hospitalizations | 30/47 (64) | - | - | |
Sex | Male | 17/23 (74) | 0.227 | - |
Female | 13/24 (54) | |||
Disease Status | Active Disease | 13/27 (57) | 0.014 | 0.156 |
Complete Response | 17/20 (85) | |||
Mucositis | None or Grade 1 | 25/32 (78) | 0.008 | 0.228 |
Grade >=2 | 5/15 (33) | |||
Age | <=45 years | 12/21 (57) | 0.543 | - |
>45 years | 18/26 (69) | |||
Concomitant PPI | No | 28/36 (78) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Yes | 2/11 (18) | |||
Concomitant Ranitidine | No | 26/42 (62) | 0.640 | - |
No | 4/5 (80) | |||
Concomitant Levofloxacine prophylaxis | Yes | 27/39 (69) | 0.118 | 0.042 |
No | 3/8 (38) | |||
Prophylaxis Discontinuation | Never | 27/36 (75) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
At least for 2 dd | 3/11 (27) | |||
Infectious Complications | None | 8/11 (73) | 0.722 | - |
At least one episode | 22/36 (61) | |||
PSZ Assumption with | Fat snack | 5/11 (46) | 0.153 | 0.150 |
Acidic drink | 25/35 (71) |
. | FCZ . | PSZ . | p . |
---|---|---|---|
All hospitalizations | 54 | 47 | - |
Median age (range) | 47 (17-72) | 47 (19-68) | 0.560 |
Median ANC <500 days (range) | 18 (12-35) | 21 (7-30) | 0.182 |
Infectious complications (%) | 43/54 (80%) | 36/47 (77%) | 0.643 |
Proven or probable IFI (%) | 16/54 (30%) | 1/47 (2%) | 0.000 |
Empirical or targeted antifungal therapy (%) | 19/54 (36%) | 5/47 (11%) | 0.002 |
. | FCZ . | PSZ . | p . |
---|---|---|---|
All hospitalizations | 54 | 47 | - |
Median age (range) | 47 (17-72) | 47 (19-68) | 0.560 |
Median ANC <500 days (range) | 18 (12-35) | 21 (7-30) | 0.182 |
Infectious complications (%) | 43/54 (80%) | 36/47 (77%) | 0.643 |
Proven or probable IFI (%) | 16/54 (30%) | 1/47 (2%) | 0.000 |
Empirical or targeted antifungal therapy (%) | 19/54 (36%) | 5/47 (11%) | 0.002 |
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.