To determine if sustained responses could be achieved after HDIT and rescue with autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic cells, we assessed the 4-yr outcome in patients (pts) with severe SSc. Thirty-four early (≤4 years), diffuse [mod. Rodnan skin score (mRSS) ≥16] SSc pts with predefined visceral organ dysfunction (primarily lung) were included. G-CSF was used for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells and the autologous graft was CD34-selected. HDIT included cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg), antithymocyte globulin (90 mg/kg) and total body irradiation (800 Gy) (with lung shielding of the last 26 pts). Neutrophil and platelet counts recovered by 9 (7–13) and 11 (7–25) days, respectively. There was a significant improvement in skin (−73%, p<0.0001) and in overall function (HAQ-DI: −56%, p<0.0001) at 4 (1–8) years in evaluable pts compared to baseline (Table). Lung, heart and kidney function, in general, remained clinically stable. Importantly, biopsies confirmed a response in skin associated with resolution or a significant decrease of dermal fibrosis. Seventeen (63%) of 27 evaluable patients surviving at least 1 year after HDIT continued to have sustained responses at 4 (1–8) yrs and required no DMARD (drug-modifying antirheumatic drug) treatment. Twelve patients died (transplant-related=8 [23%]; SSc-related=4 [12%]). Two transplant-related deaths were secondary to renal crisis events that occurred within 3 months of HDIT. The other 6 transplant-related deaths were cardiac or pulmonary toxicities (n=4), EBV-PTLD (n=1) and a myelodysplastic syndrome (n=1). The estimated overall survival was 64% at 5 yrs. In conclusion, sustained responses were observed in 63% of evaluable patients after HDIT (median: 4 yrs) and marked improvement in skin and overall function was observed in high-risk SSc pts. A decrease in skin score was associated with skin remodeling.

Assess-mentsMean Baseline (BL) (n=34)Year 1–2 Difference from BL*Year 3–4 Difference from BL*Year 5–8 Difference from BL*Difference at 4 (1–8) Yrs from BL*
* Difference between last measurement in that time period from baseline. 
mRSS (skin score) 30.12 −17.56, p<0.0001 (n=25) −21.24, p<0.0001 (n=21) −21.82, p<0.0001 (n=11) −22.08, p<0.0001 (n=25) 
mHAQ (disability score) 1.85 −1.26, p<0.0001 (n=23) −1.08, p<0.0001 (n=20) −1.50, p<0.0001 (n=11) −1.03, p<0.0001 (n=26) 
FVC (%) 71.53 4.48, p=0.06 (n=27) 2.09, p=0.56 (n=23) 10.36, p=0.007 (n=11) 2.11, p=0.50 (n=27) 
DLCO (%) 60.09 −1.37, p=0.60 (n=27) −3.70, p=0.31 (n=23) −2.27, p=0.51 (n=11) −7.07, p=0.02 (n=27) 
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.78 0.26, p=0.02 (n=26) 0.25, p=0.009 (n=23) 0.13, p=0.008 (n=11) 0.25, p=0.003 (n=27) 
Ejection Fraction (%) 63.24 −0.21, p=0.90 (n=24) −2.84, p=0.06 (n=19) −3.85, p=0.03 (n=11) −2.37, p=0.06 (n=27) 
Assess-mentsMean Baseline (BL) (n=34)Year 1–2 Difference from BL*Year 3–4 Difference from BL*Year 5–8 Difference from BL*Difference at 4 (1–8) Yrs from BL*
* Difference between last measurement in that time period from baseline. 
mRSS (skin score) 30.12 −17.56, p<0.0001 (n=25) −21.24, p<0.0001 (n=21) −21.82, p<0.0001 (n=11) −22.08, p<0.0001 (n=25) 
mHAQ (disability score) 1.85 −1.26, p<0.0001 (n=23) −1.08, p<0.0001 (n=20) −1.50, p<0.0001 (n=11) −1.03, p<0.0001 (n=26) 
FVC (%) 71.53 4.48, p=0.06 (n=27) 2.09, p=0.56 (n=23) 10.36, p=0.007 (n=11) 2.11, p=0.50 (n=27) 
DLCO (%) 60.09 −1.37, p=0.60 (n=27) −3.70, p=0.31 (n=23) −2.27, p=0.51 (n=11) −7.07, p=0.02 (n=27) 
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.78 0.26, p=0.02 (n=26) 0.25, p=0.009 (n=23) 0.13, p=0.008 (n=11) 0.25, p=0.003 (n=27) 
Ejection Fraction (%) 63.24 −0.21, p=0.90 (n=24) −2.84, p=0.06 (n=19) −3.85, p=0.03 (n=11) −2.37, p=0.06 (n=27) 

Disclosure: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Corresponding author

Sign in via your Institution