Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) such as teclistamab, elranatamab, linvoseltamab, and talquetamab have impressive efficacy in multiple myeloma (MM) but come with substantial infectious risks that do not dissipate over time. Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT), which includes intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG), may lower these risks. In this Viewpoint, we contrast primary IgRT prophylaxis (initiation regardless of IgG levels) with preemptive IgRT treatment (initiation only once IgG levels fall below a certain threshold) in this setting. We make evidence-based arguments for primary prophylaxis as a safer and simpler approach compared to preemptive IgG-guided IgRT. We also discuss strategies to improve the cost-effectiveness of IVIG and SCIG across the world. Given the overwhelmingly favorable benefit-risk profile of IgRT coupled with the limitations inherent to IgG measurements in MM, withholding IgRT access based on arbitrary IgG thresholds is neither scientifically sound nor clinically appropriate for patients with MM receiving bsAb therapy.
Skip Nav Destination
Review Article|
July 21, 2025
IVIG prophylaxis should be initiated following bispecific antibody therapy in multiple myeloma regardless of IgG levels Open Access
Rahul Banerjee,
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, SEATTLE, Washington, United States
* Corresponding Author; email: rahul.banerjee.md@gmail.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Meera Mohan,
Meera Mohan
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Kai Rejeski,
Kai Rejeski
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Benjamin R. Puliafito,
Benjamin R. Puliafito
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Diana D. Cirstea,
Diana D. Cirstea
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Gurbakhash Kaur,
Gurbakhash Kaur
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Shonali Midha,
Shonali Midha
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Georgia J McCaughan,
Georgia J McCaughan
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Nikhil M Kumar,
Nikhil M Kumar
Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram, India
Search for other works by this author on:
Nikita Mehra,
Nikita Mehra
Cachar Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Silchar, Assam, India
Search for other works by this author on:
Bhausaheb Bagal,
Bhausaheb Bagal
Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Alabama, India
Search for other works by this author on:
Noopur S. Raje
Noopur S. Raje
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Blood Adv bloodadvances.2025016490.
Article history
Submitted:
March 13, 2025
Revision Received:
June 9, 2025
Accepted:
July 1, 2025
Citation
Rahul Banerjee, Meera Mohan, Kai Rejeski, Benjamin R. Puliafito, Diana D. Cirstea, Gurbakhash Kaur, Shonali Midha, Georgia J McCaughan, Nikhil M Kumar, Nikita Mehra, Bhausaheb Bagal, Noopur S. Raje; IVIG prophylaxis should be initiated following bispecific antibody therapy in multiple myeloma regardless of IgG levels. Blood Adv 2025; bloodadvances.2025016490. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016490
Download citation file:
Advertisement intended for health care professionals
Cited By
Advertisement intended for health care professionals