https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0396-2005
Key Points
PROM total score, PROM total score change, and NIH 0-3 skin change are associated with clinician-reported response in cutaneous sclerosis
HAP AAS, SF36 vitality change, LSS skin, and LSS skin change are associated with patient-reported benefit in cutaneous sclerosis
Cutaneous sclerosis, a highly morbid subtype of chronic graft vs. host disease (cGVHD), demonstrates limited treatment response under current NIH Response Measures. We explored novel sclerosis-specific response measures using Chronic GVHD Consortium data. A training cohort included patients with cutaneous sclerosis from a randomized trial of imatinib vs. rituximab, and a Consortium observational study. The validation cohort was a different Consortium observational study. Clinician-reported measures (baseline, and baseline to 6-month change) were examined for association with 6-month clinician-reported response. Patient-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were studied for association with 6-month patient-reported response. A total of 347 subjects were included (training 183, validation 164). While multiple skin and joint measures were associated with clinician-reported response on univariate analysis, PROM total score, PROM total score change, and NIH 0-3 skin change were retained in the final multivariate model (AUC 0.83 training, 0.75 validation). Similarly, many patient-reported measures were associated, but final multivariate analysis retained the HAP AAS, SF36 vitality change, LSS skin, and LSS skin change in the model (AUC 0.86 training, 0.75 validation). We identified which sclerosis measures have greatest association with 6-month clinician- and patient-reported treatment response, a previously unstudied area. However, given the observed performance in the validation cohorts, we conclude that further work is needed. Novel response measures may be needed to optimally assess treatment response in cutaneous sclerosis.
