Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has heralded a transformative era in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) following the first relapse. In the context of triple-class-exposed MM, CAR-T cells targeted against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) have yielded response rates and outcomes that surpass the capabilities of existing therapeutic options (Table).1,2  Extended follow-up data from the CARTITUDE-1 and LEGEND-2 studies have reinforced this significant stride forward, emphasizing the profound and enduring responses that can be achieved in a majority of heavily treated patients with MM using a “one-and-done” CAR-T approach.3,4  Given these results, there is an urgent need to explore the potential of CAR-T therapy in earlier lines of treatment.

Table

Key Trials of CAR-T Therapy Against B-cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) in Patients With MM

KarMMa2 CARTITUDE-11 KarMM-36 CARTITUDE-45 
Cell dose 150-450 × 106 cells 0.75 × 106 cells/kg 150-450 × 106 cells 0.71 × 106 cells/kg 
Prior lines, median (range) 6 (3-16) 6 (4-8) 3 (2-4) 2 (1-3) 
Median follow up 24.8 months 33.4 months 18.6 months 16 months 
Overall response rate/≥Complete response rate 73%/33% 97.9%/82.5% 71%/39% 85%/73% 
Median progression free survival 8.6 months 34.5 months 13.3 months Not reached 
KarMMa2 CARTITUDE-11 KarMM-36 CARTITUDE-45 
Cell dose 150-450 × 106 cells 0.75 × 106 cells/kg 150-450 × 106 cells 0.71 × 106 cells/kg 
Prior lines, median (range) 6 (3-16) 6 (4-8) 3 (2-4) 2 (1-3) 
Median follow up 24.8 months 33.4 months 18.6 months 16 months 
Overall response rate/≥Complete response rate 73%/33% 97.9%/82.5% 71%/39% 85%/73% 
Median progression free survival 8.6 months 34.5 months 13.3 months Not reached 

In a pivotal development, results from two randomized trials published in 2023 illuminated the advantages of CAR-T therapy over the standard of care (SOC) in the early lines of MM treatment.5,6  The CARTITUDE-4 trial compared ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) with the SOC in patients with lenalidomide-refractory MM who had received one to three prior lines of therapy.5  Concurrently, the KarMMa-3 trial evaluated idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) against the SOC in patients with two to four prior therapies.6  Both trials not only affirmed the safety of a single CAR-T infusion but also underscored its remarkable therapeutic potential by demonstrating a favorable risk–benefit profile when compared with that for the SOC. The standout finding was from the CARTITUDE-4 trial, shedding light on the advantages of CAR-T therapy even for patients experiencing their initial relapse. Patients in early stages of relapse appeared to derive more pronounced benefits than their counterparts in later stages of relapse, with these advantages expected to be further accentuated with extended follow-up. It is noteworthy that, in the U.S., the majority of patients facing their first relapse have lenalidomide-refractory disease, historically enduring poor outcomes with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of less than 1 year.7,8  Notwithstanding the FDA’s approval of various regimens in this therapeutic realm, the unprecedented efficacy of CAR-T therapy in this patient subgroup renders it an appealing therapeutic option. This approach also allows for a “treatment-free” interval — a rare benefit for patients with MM.

Moreover, administration of CAR-T therapy has been associated with a decreased incidence of CAR-T-specific adverse events in patients with a lower disease burden.5  These patients exhibit heightened disease sensitivity, reducing the necessity for bridging and alleviating concerns about the time-consuming manufacturing process for CAR-T cells. Embracing this approach will position patients with MM (including those with lenalidomide-refractory MM) to reap more substantial benefits from CAR-T therapy than have been achieved in later lines of therapy, when treatment attrition rates tend to be higher.

In conclusion, the remarkable efficacy of CAR-T therapy when compared with that of currently available treatments, particularly in the case of lenalidomide-refractory MM, underscores the importance of its early integration at the first relapse stage. This approach not only enhances patient outcomes but also diminishes the likelihood of patient attrition during transitions between treatments. The early adoption of CAR-T therapy represents a promising strategy in the evolving treatment landscape for MM. Ongoing and forthcoming trials are actively investigating the role of CAR-T therapy in the frontline setting for MM — an acknowledgment of its transformative potential. As such, CAR-T therapy is poised to become a pivotal tool in our ongoing pursuit of a potential “cure” for MM.

Dr. Dhakal has received research funding from BMS, Janssen, Arcellx, Carsgen, Sanofi, Caribou, and Gracell, honoraria from Karyopharm, BMS, and Janssen, and reported advisory board activity for BMS, Janssen, Arcellx, Sanofi, and GSK.

1
Berdeja
JG
,
Madduri
D
,
Usmani
SZ
, et al
.
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): A phase 1b/2 open-label study
.
Lancet
.
2021
;
398
(
10297
):
314
324
.
2
Munshi
NC
,
Anderson
Jr
LD
,
Shah
N
, et al
.
Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2021
;
384
(
8
):
705
716
.
3
Lin
Y
,
Martin
TG
,
Usmani
SZ
, et al
.
CARTITUDE-1 final results: Phase 1b/2 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2023
;
41
(
16_suppl
):
8009
.
4
Mi
JQ
,
Zhao
WH
,
Chen
LJ
, et al
.
Long-term remission and survival in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after treatment of LCAR-B38M CAR-T: At least 5-year follow-up in LEGEND-2
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2023
;
41
(
16_suppl
):
8010
.
5
San-Miguel
J
,
Dhakal
B
,
Yong
K
, et al
.
Cilta-cel or standard care in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2023
;
389
335
347
.
6
Rodriguez-Otero
P
,
Ailawadhi
S
,
Arnulf
B
, et al
.
Ide-cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2023
;
388
(
11
):
1002
1014
.
7
Dhakal
B
,
Einsele
H
,
Potluri
R
, et al
.
P899: Real-world assessment of treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with lenalidomide-refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma from the optum database
.
HemaSphere
.
2022
;
6
790
791
.
8
Dhakal
B
,
Einsele
H
,
Potluri
R
, et al
.
P-240: Real-world assessment of treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with lenalidomide-refractory relapsed multiple myeloma from the SEER-Medicare database
.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk
.
2022
;
22
:
S167
.