Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thromboinflammatory disorder characterized by thrombosis and/or recurrent fetal loss accompanied by persistently positive tests for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). APS is not uncommon, accounting for 10 to 15% of recurrent pregnancy losses,1  and is the leading cause of stroke in patients under 45 years of age, accounting for 20% of strokes in this age group.2  In catastrophic APS (CAPS), rapidly developing, widespread thrombosis leads to ischemic organ failure, which has high morbidity and mortality.3 

The estimated prevalence of APS is 40 to 50 cases in 100,000.4  Women are affected 3 to 5 times more frequently than men,5  and most patients are diagnosed before the age of 50 years.6  APS is common in people with systemic autoimmune disorders (secondary APS) and complicates over one-third of systemic lupus erythematosus cases.

Thrombotic APS

Stroke and lower extremity deep vein thrombosis are the most common arterial and venous thrombotic events, respectively. However, thrombosis at unusual sites, such as the cerebral venous sinuses or splanchnic vasculature, should prompt testing for APS. Recurrent thrombosis can occur despite anticoagulation therapy.7  CAPS is the most severe form of thrombotic APS, in which macro- and micro-vascular thromboses develop in multiple (≥3) organs within a short time (<1 week) and small vessel thrombosis is seen on tissue biopsy. CAPS is frequently associated with a “trigger” such as infection, surgery, pregnancy, or changes in anticoagulation.

Obstetric APS

Recurrent pregnancy loss or premature birth due to severe preeclampsia or placental insufficiency are hallmarks of obstetric APS. Live birth rates are only around 70%, and rates of preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) are also increased in those with obstetric APS.8 

Other manifestations

Some patients exhibit predominantly microvascular involvement, such as livedoid vasculopathy, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, or antiphospholipid nephropathy. Other “non-criteria” manifestations include thrombocytopenia, livedo reticularis, skin ulcers, valvular disease, migraines, etc.7,9 

The majority of aPL are directed not against phospholipids but against a variety of phospholipid binding proteins expressed on or bound to cellular membranes.10  These antibodies, particularly those directed against β2-glycoprotein-I (β2GPI), drive the pathogenesis of thrombosis and obstetric complications.11  Multiple pathogenic downstream effects of aPL have been described, including the inhibition of natural anticoagulants and fibrinolysis and the potentiation of procoagulant mechanisms. Increasingly recognized as a thromboinflammatory disease, APS is characterized by activation of leukocytes (particularly monocytes and neutrophils), endothelium, and platelets that leads to prothrombotic and proinflammatory changes.12  Complement activation plays a critical role in aPL-associated pregnancy loss and thrombosis and can be observed in 90% of patients with CAPS. Further, 50% of patients with CAPS have mutations in complement genes, a frequency similar to that observed for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.13  The multiple-hit hypothesis argues that aPL lead to a generalized prothrombotic state and that an environmental second-hit may be required to trigger thrombosis or CAPS.14 

Updated in 2006, the Sapporo classification criteria for APS require both objectively confirmed thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity (Table 1) and persistently positive results for lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-β2GPI, and/or anti-cardiolipin IgM or IgG antibodies.15  The clinical significance of IgA aPL or “non-criteria” aPL directed against phospholipid binding proteins such as prothrombin, phosphatidylserine, and phosphatidylethanolamine remains controversial, and these assays are not routinely performed in clinical practice.

Table

Updated Sapporo classification criteria for the diagnosis of APS.15  Requires one clinical and at least one positive laboratory test positive on two or more occasions spaced at least 12 weeks apart.

Clinical Criteria
1) One or more unexplained pregnancy loss at or beyond the 10th week of gestation 
2) Three or more unexplained pregnancy losses before the 10th week gestation 
3) One or more preterm births (<34 weeks gestation) due to severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, or features of placental insufficiency 
4) Venous thromboembolism (VTE) 
5) Arterial thromboembolism (ATE) 
6) Biopsy proven small-vessel thromboembolism
 
Laboratory Criteria
 
1) Presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) 
2) Anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) of IgG or IgM with a titer >99th percentile or >40 GPL or MPL 
3) Anti-β2 glycoprotein antibody of IgG or IgM with a titer >99th percentile 
Clinical Criteria
1) One or more unexplained pregnancy loss at or beyond the 10th week of gestation 
2) Three or more unexplained pregnancy losses before the 10th week gestation 
3) One or more preterm births (<34 weeks gestation) due to severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, or features of placental insufficiency 
4) Venous thromboembolism (VTE) 
5) Arterial thromboembolism (ATE) 
6) Biopsy proven small-vessel thromboembolism
 
Laboratory Criteria
 
1) Presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) 
2) Anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) of IgG or IgM with a titer >99th percentile or >40 GPL or MPL 
3) Anti-β2 glycoprotein antibody of IgG or IgM with a titer >99th percentile 

GPL: IgG phospholipid units

MPL: IgM phospholipid units

Clinical severity in APS varies widely, ranging from asymptomatic carrier status to single/recurrent thrombosis to CAPS. Persistent LA is the strongest isolated predictor of thrombotic and obstetric complications.16  IgG anti-β2GPI and anti-cardiolipin antibodies are more strongly associated with thrombosis than IgM antibodies.11  Triple positivity (positivity for LA, anticardiolipin, and anti-β2GPI antibodies) is associated with the highest risk for first or recurrent thrombosis.17  However, the aPL profile does not identify patients who are at risk of developing CAPS or anticoagulant-refractory thrombosis or, conversely, patients who have minimal ongoing thrombosis risk and may safely discontinue anticoagulation. Further, not all patients with aPL develop thrombosis; even triple-positive patients experience initial thrombosis at a rate of only 5.3% per year.17 

Indefinite anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 to 3 remains the standard of care for thrombotic APS.18  For arterial thrombosis, antiplatelet therapy (aspirin) is commonly added to warfarin.19  Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not recommended for thrombotic APS: Recent trials in both high-risk (triple positive APS) and unselected thrombotic APS populations have demonstrated increased rates of recurrent thrombosis (particularly arterial thrombosis) among patients taking rivaroxaban or apixaban when compared with those observed among patients taking warfarin.20,21  However, these trials were not enriched for patients with lower-risk APS (e.g., single-positive APS). DOACs may still be considered for some patients with lower-risk APS without arterial thrombosis or recurrent events, those who are either unwilling or unable to undergo appropriate INR monitoring, and those who are already on stable anticoagulation with a DOAC.22  Recurrent thrombosis on therapeutic warfarin may be treated by adding antiplatelet therapy, escalating the intensity of warfarin (INR >3), or switching to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). During pregnancy, patients with APS are treated with prophylactic doses of LMWH in combination with low-dose aspirin; therapeutic doses of LMWH are substituted in those with a history of thrombosis.23 

For CAPS, firstline “triple therapy” that includes a combination of anticoagulation, high-dose corticosteroids, and plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin is the standard of care.24  In a series of 471 patients, triple therapy was associated with a lower rate of mortality (28.6%) than other combination therapies (41.1%).25  Rituximab is sometimes used as adjuvant treatment, especially when cases are refractory to firstline therapy.26  Recent mechanistic insights support a role of complement inhibition in CAPS and anticoagulant-refractory thrombotic APS. Real-world evidence suggests that terminal complement inhibition with eculizumab is effective in a subset of CAPS cases and may be most appropriate for patients with thrombocytopenia and features of thrombotic microangiopathy.27,28  Additional research is needed to identify patients who will benefit from these targeted therapies.

APS is a thromboinflammatory disorder with pleomorphic disease manifestations, ranging from asymptomatic carrier status to rapidly progressive multiorgan thrombosis with high mortality. The majority of patients do well on vitamin K antagonists, but there is a pressing need to improve risk stratification tools to guide personalized therapy and for clinical trials designed to investigate novel targeted approaches, such as complement inhibition for the more severe forms of APS.

Dr. Chaturvedi has received honoraria for participation on advisory boards or received consulting fees from Alexion, Sanofi, UCB, Sobi, and Takeda, and has received honoraria/royalties from UpToDate.com and Dynamed.com. Dr. Gerber has served on advisory boards for Apellis Pharmaceuticals and Alexion Pharmaceuticals and contributed to the Merck Manual, for which she received an honorarium. Dr. Gerber's spouse is an employee of Pfizer and holds stock.

1
Yetman
DL
,
Kutteh
WH
.
Antiphospholipid antibody panels and recurrent pregnancy loss: Prevalence of anticardiolipin antibodies compared with other antiphospholipid antibodies
.
Fertil Steril
.
1996
;
66
(
4
):
540
546
.
2
Chighizola
CB
,
Andreoli
L
,
de Jesus
GR
, et al
.
The association between antiphospholipid antibodies and pregnancy morbidity, stroke, myocardial infarction, and deep vein thrombosis: A critical review of the literature
.
Lupus
.
2015
;
24
(
9
):
980
984
.
3
Cervera
R
,
Espinosa
G
.
Update on the catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome and the “CAPS Registry”
.
Semin Thromb Hemost
.
2012
;
38
(
04
):
333
338
.
4
Duarte-García
A
,
Pham
MM
,
Crowson
CS
, et al
.
The epidemiology of antiphospholipid syndrome: A population-based study
.
Arthritis Rheumatol
.
2019
;
71
(
9
):
1545
1552
.
5
Pons-Estel
GJ
,
Andreoli
L
,
Scanzi
F
, et al
.
The antiphospholipid syndrome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
.
J Autoimmun
.
2017
;
76
:
10
20
.
6
Cervera
R
,
Piette
J-C
,
Font
J
, et al
.
Antiphospholipid syndrome: Clinical and immunologic manifestations and patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1,000 patients
.
Arthritis Rheum
.
2002
;
46
(
4
):
1019
1027
.
7
Cervera
R
,
Serrano
R
,
Pons-Estel
GJ
, et al
.
Morbidity and mortality in the antiphospholipid syndrome during a 10-year period: A multicentre prospective study of 1000 patients
.
Ann Rheum Dis
.
2015
;
74
(
6
):
1011
1018
.
8
Saccone
G
,
Berghella
V
,
Maruotti
GM
, et al
.
Antiphospholipid antibody profile based obstetric outcomes of primary antiphospholipid syndrome: The PREGNANTS study
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
.
2017
;
216
(
5
):
525.e1
-
525.e12
.
9
Abreu
MM
,
Danowski
A
,
Wahl
DG
, et al
.
The relevance of “non-criteria” clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome: 14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Technical Task Force Report on Antiphospholipid Syndrome Clinical Features
.
Autoimmun Rev
.
2015
;
14
(
5
):
401
414
.
10
Bevers
EM
,
Galli
M
,
Barbui
T
, et al
.
Lupus anticoagulant IgG’s (LA) are not directed to phospholipids only, but to a complex of lipid-bound human prothrombin
.
Thromb Haemost
.
1991
;
66
(
6
):
629
632
.
11
Galli
M
,
Borrelli
G
,
Jacobsen
EM
, et al
.
Clinical significance of different antiphospholipid antibodies in the WAPS (warfarin in the antiphospholipid syndrome) study
.
Blood
.
2007
;
110
(
4
):
1178
1183
.
12
Knight
JS
,
Branch
DW
,
Ortel
TL
.
Antiphospholipid syndrome: Advances in diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management
.
BMJ
.
2023
:
e069717
.
13
Chaturvedi
S
,
Braunstein
EM
,
Yuan
X
, et al
.
Complement activity and complement regulatory gene mutations are associated with thrombosis in APS and CAPS
.
Blood
.
2020
;
135
(
4
):
239
251
.
14
Meroni
PL
,
Riboldi
P
.
Pathogenic mechanisms mediating antiphospholipid syndrome
.
Curr Opin Rheumatol
.
2001
;
13
(
5
):
377
382
.
15
Miyakis
S
,
Lockshin
MD
,
Atsumi
T
, et al
.
International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)
.
J Thromb Haemost
.
2006
;
4
(
2
):
295
306
.
16
Yelnik
CM
,
Laskin
CA
,
Porter
TF
, et al
.
Lupus anticoagulant is the main predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes in aPL-positive patients: Validation of PROMISSE study results
.
Lupus Sci Med
.
2016
;
3
(
1
):
e000131
.
17
Pengo
V
,
Ruffatti
A
,
Legnani
C
, et al
.
Incidence of a first thromboembolic event in asymptomatic carriers of high-risk antiphospholipid antibody profile: A multicenter prospective study
.
Blood
.
2011
;
118
(
17
):
4714
4718
.
18
Crowther
MA
,
Ginsberg
JS
,
Julian
J
, et al
.
A comparison of two intensities of warfarin for the prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
.
N Engl J Med
.
2003
;
349
(
12
):
1133
1138
.
19
Tektonidou
MG
,
Andreoli
L
,
Limper
M
, et al
.
EULAR recommendations for the management of antiphospholipid syndrome in adults
.
Ann Rheum Dis
.
2019
;
78
(
10
):
1296
1304
.
20
Pengo
V
,
Denas
G
,
Zoppellaro
G
, et al
.
Rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome
.
Blood
.
2018
;
132
(
13
):
1365
1371
.
21
Woller
SC
,
Stevens
SM
,
Kaplan
D
, et al
.
Apixaban compared with warfarin to prevent thrombosis in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: A randomized trial
.
Blood Adv
.
2022
;
6
(
6
):
1661
1670
.
22
Pastori
D
,
Menichelli
D
,
Cammisotto
V
, et al
.
Use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review and comparison of the international guidelines
.
Frontiers Cardiovasc Med
.
2021
;
8
:
715878
.
23
Sammaritano
LR
,
Bermas
BL
,
Chakravarty
EE
, et al
.
2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Reproductive Health in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases
.
Arthritis Rheum
.
2020
;
72
(
4
):
529
556
.
24
Legault
K
,
Schunemann
H
,
Hillis
C
, et al
.
McMaster RARE-Bestpractices clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and management of the catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome
.
J Thromb Haemost
.
2018
;
16
(
8
):
1656
1664
.
25
Rodríguez-Pintó
I
,
Espinosa
G
,
Erkan
D
, et al
.
The effect of triple therapy on the mortality of catastrophic anti-phospholipid syndrome patients
.
Rheumatology
.
2018
;
57
(
7
):
1264
1270
.
26
Berman
H
,
Rodríguez-Pintó
I
,
Cervera
R
, et al
.
Rituximab use in the catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: Descriptive analysis of the CAPS registry patients receiving rituximab
.
Autoimmun Rev
.
2013
;
12
(
11
):
1085
1090
.
27
Yelnik
CM
,
Miranda
S
,
Mékinian
A
, et al
.
Patients with refractory catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome respond inconsistently to eculizumab
.
Blood
.
2020
;
136
(
21
):
2473
2477
.
28
López-Benjume
B
,
Rodríguez-Pintó
I
,
Amigo
MC
, et al
.
Eculizumab use in catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS): Descriptive analysis from the “CAPS Registry”
.
Autoimmun Rev
.
2022
;
21
(
4
):
103055
.