Ponikowski P, Kirwan BA, Anker SD, et al. Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency at discharge after acute heart failure: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10266):18951904. .

Iron homeostasis is essential for cell energy, effective hematopoiesis, and organ metabolism.1  Approximately 1.24 billion people worldwide are affected by iron deficiency (ID) anemia, and it is considered a significant contributor to disability globally.2,3  In the past few decades, tremendous research has improved our understanding of how inflammation of chronic disease modulates hepcidin regulation and contributes to ID.4  In patients with heart failure (HF), the prevalence of ID with or without anemia reaches estimates as high as 40 to 80 percent.4,5  ID in patients with HF, irrespective of hemoglobin, contributes to cardiac and peripheral muscle dysfunction, resulting in decreased exercise capacity, poor quality of life, increased hospitalization, and patient mortality. Furthermore, recurrent hospitalization of patients with HF poses ongoing health care burden and economic challenges.6,7 

Current guidelines from the Canadian Cardiovascular Society recommend that intravenous (IV) iron be considered for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and ID to improve exercise tolerance and quality of life, and reduce HF hospitalizations (strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence).8  IV iron rapidly repletes iron stores and is recommended over oral administration. Numerous clinical trials and meta-analyses have improved the quality of evidence on the above outcomes including FAIR-HF, CONFIRM-HF, and EFFECT-HF (Table), but these studies have not demonstrated a mortality benefit. Of note, these studies evaluated the use of IV iron in chronic ambulatory patients with HF.

Table.

Completed Trials of HF and ID Treated With FCM Versus Placebo

STUDY TITLE
FAIR-HF10 CONFIRM-HF11 EFFECT-HF12 AFFIRM-AHF
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00520780 NCT01453608 NCT01394562 NCT02937454 
Diagnosis HFrEF ≤ 40% for NYHA class I, ≤ 45% NYHA for class III HFrEF ≤ 45% NYHA class II-III HFrEF ≤ 45% NYHA class II-III HFrEF ≤ 50% for NYHA class II-III 
Iron Deficiency Definition Ferritin < 100 ng/mL, or 100-299 ng/mL with TSAT < 20% Ferritin < 100 ng/mL, or 100-299 ng/mL with TSAT < 20% Ferritin < 100 ng/mL, or 100-299 ng/ mL with TSAT < 20% Ferritin < 100 ng/mL, or 100-299 ng/mL with TSAT < 20% 
Hgb (g/dL) ≥ 9.5 - ≤ 13.5 < 15 ≤ 15 ≥ 8 - ≤ 13.5 
No. of Patients 459 304 174 1108 
Randomization (FCM:placebo) 2:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 
Duration (weeks) 24 52 24 52 
FCM Dosage (mg) 200 weekly until iron repletion, then every 4 weeks 500-3,500 total according to Hgb and weight at day 0, weeks 6, 12, 24, and 36 500-1,000 according to Hgb and weight at day 0, week 6, and week 12 500-1,500 FCM according to Hgb and weight value at discharge, weeks 6, 12, and 24 
Primary Outcome Change in self-reported PGA score and NHYA class from baseline to week 2 Change in 6-min walk distance from baseline to week 24 Change in peak VO2 from baseline to week 2 HF hospitalizations and CV death up to 52 weeks after randomization 
Results PGA: OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.75-3.61; p<0.001
NYHA: OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.55-3.71; p<0.001 
Difference in FCM vs. placebo, ± 11 meters; p= 0.002 Placebo, –1.19 ± 0.389 mL/min/kg; FCM, –0.16 ± 0.387 mL/min/kg; p=0.020 between groups Rate ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-1.01; p= 0.059 
STUDY TITLE
FAIR-HF10 CONFIRM-HF11 EFFECT-HF12 AFFIRM-AHF
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00520780 NCT01453608 NCT01394562 NCT02937454 
Diagnosis HFrEF ≤ 40% for NYHA class I, ≤ 45% NYHA for class III HFrEF ≤ 45% NYHA class II-III HFrEF ≤ 45% NYHA class II-III HFrEF ≤ 50% for NYHA class II-III 
Iron Deficiency Definition Ferritin < 100 ng/mL, or 100-299 ng/mL with TSAT < 20% Ferritin < 100 ng/mL, or 100-299 ng/mL with TSAT < 20% Ferritin < 100 ng/mL, or 100-299 ng/ mL with TSAT < 20% Ferritin < 100 ng/mL, or 100-299 ng/mL with TSAT < 20% 
Hgb (g/dL) ≥ 9.5 - ≤ 13.5 < 15 ≤ 15 ≥ 8 - ≤ 13.5 
No. of Patients 459 304 174 1108 
Randomization (FCM:placebo) 2:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 
Duration (weeks) 24 52 24 52 
FCM Dosage (mg) 200 weekly until iron repletion, then every 4 weeks 500-3,500 total according to Hgb and weight at day 0, weeks 6, 12, 24, and 36 500-1,000 according to Hgb and weight at day 0, week 6, and week 12 500-1,500 FCM according to Hgb and weight value at discharge, weeks 6, 12, and 24 
Primary Outcome Change in self-reported PGA score and NHYA class from baseline to week 2 Change in 6-min walk distance from baseline to week 24 Change in peak VO2 from baseline to week 2 HF hospitalizations and CV death up to 52 weeks after randomization 
Results PGA: OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.75-3.61; p<0.001
NYHA: OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.55-3.71; p<0.001 
Difference in FCM vs. placebo, ± 11 meters; p= 0.002 Placebo, –1.19 ± 0.389 mL/min/kg; FCM, –0.16 ± 0.387 mL/min/kg; p=0.020 between groups Rate ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-1.01; p= 0.059 

Table adapted with permission from von Haehling, et al. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7:36-46.

Abbreviations: HgB, hemoglobin; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; TSAT, transferrin saturation; FCM, ferric carboxymaltose; PGA, Patient Global Assessment; OR, odds ratio.

In AFFIRM-AHF, investigators aimed to prospectively evaluate the use of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) compared to placebo in stabilized patients following an acute HF episode, when the risks of rehospitalization and mortality are anticipated to be the highest. This was a multicenter double-blind randomized control trial examining the effect of FCM versus placebo (1:1) with a primary composite outcome of total hospitalizations for HF and cardiovascular (CV) death up to one year following hospitalization and stabilization after an episode of acute HF. The study involved 121 sites in Europe, South America, and Singapore, and enrolled 1,108 eligible patients who had been hospitalized with acute HF and concomitant ID (ferritin < 100 µg/L, or 100-299 µg/L with transferrin saturation < 20%) and had a left ventricular ejection fraction lower than 50 percent. In the FCM group, 293 primary events occurred, compared to 372 events in the placebo arm (rate ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-1.01; p=0.059). There was no difference in CV death between the two groups (p=0.81).

Although the study fell just shy of its composite primary outcome of total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death, the investigators concluded that in patients with ID and HF with an EF lower than 50 percent, FCM could be safely used around the time of discharge following an acute episode of HF, leading to a reduced risk of HF hospitalizations without an apparent impact on CV mortality. While the COVID-19 pandemic affected patient management and follow-up during this study, a pre-COVID sensitivity analysis did demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in the primary outcome. Interestingly, a subgroup analysis in nonischemic patients with HF did not favor FCM over placebo, which speaks to the variability and heterogeneity in the pathophysiology of heart disease in this patient population. Further studies are needed.

Following this trial, a meta-analysis that included 2,166 patients across seven trials, including data from AFFIRM-AHF, confirmed that IV iron reduced the composite outcome of HF hospitalizations or CV death (odds ratio, 0.73; p=0.0003), but the impact on CV death alone was uncertain (p=0.47).9  There are four other ongoing clinical trials evaluating the use of FCM in HRrEF (NCT03036462, NCT03037931, NCT01978028, NCT03218384).

So, what can we take away from this study? The AFFIRM-AHF data reinforce the benefits of IV iron in HFrEF and ID in terms of patient morbidity, even in the acute HF setting. It is notable that this benefit occurs even in patients with ID and HF who do not have overt anemia and may have a real impact on repeat hospitalizations without evidence of harm. In an era of interdisciplinary care, these data present an opportunity for hematologists and cardiologists to collaborate, and we should strongly consider adding this to the armamentarium of acute HF therapies available.

Dr. Rupani and Dr. Tseng indicated no relevant conflicts of interest.

1.
Camaschella
C
.
Iron deficiency
.
Blood
.
2019
;
133
(
1
):
30
39
.
2.
GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators
.
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
.
Lancet
.
2017
;
390
(
10100
):
1211
1259
.
3.
Kassebaum
NJ
,
Jasrasaria
R
,
Naghavi
M
, et al
.
A systematic analysis of global anemia burden from 1990 to 2010
.
Blood
.
2014
;
123
(
5
):
615
624
.
4.
von Haehling
S
,
Ebner
N
,
Evertz
R
, et al
.
Iron deficiency in heart failure: An overview
.
JACC Heart Fail
.
2019
;
7
(
1
):
36
46
.
5.
Rocha
BML
,
Cunha
GJL
,
Menezes Falcão
LF
.
The burden of iron deficiency in heart failure: Therapeutic approach
.
J Am Coll Cardiol
.
2018
;
71
(
7
):
782
793
.
6.
Delgado
JF
,
Oliva
J
,
González-Franco
A
, et al
.
Budget impact of ferric carboxymaltose treatment in patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency in Spain
.
J Med Econ
.
2020
;
23
(
12
)
1418
1424
.
7.
Loncar
G
,
Obradovic
D
,
Thiele
H
, et al
.
Iron deficiency in heart failure
.
ESC Heart Fail
.
2021
;
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13265
.
8.
Ezekowitz
JA
,
O'Meara
E
,
McDonald
MA
, et al
.
2017 Comprehensive Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure
.
Can J Cardiol
.
2017
;
33
(
11
):
1342
1433
.
9.
Graham
FJ
,
Pellicori
P
,
Ford
I
, et al
.
Intravenous iron for heart failure with evidence of iron deficiency: a meta-analysis of randomised trials
.
Clin Res Cardiol
.
2021
;
doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01837-8
.
10.
Anker
SD
,
Comin Colet
J
,
Filippatos
G
, et al
.
Ferric carboxymaltose in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency
.
N Engl J Med
.
2009
;
361
(
25
):
2436
2448
.
11.
Ponikowski
P
,
van Veldhuisen
DJ
,
Comin-Colet
J
, et al
.
Beneficial effects of long-term intravenous iron therapy with ferric carboxymaltose in patients with symptomatic heart failure and iron deficiency†
.
Eur Heart J
.
2015
;
36
(
11
):
657
668
.
12.
van Veldhuisen
DJ
,
Ponikowski
P
,
van der Meer
P
, et al
.
Effect of ferric carboxymaltose on exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency
.
Circulation
.
2017
;
136
(
15
):
1374
1383
.