Figure 2.
Cellular characteristics of the final CAR–T-cell product. (A) The final product of CAR-expressing T cells showed mainly Tcm and Tem T cells regardless of TCR expression after expansion (n = 3). (B) Surface expression profile of several costimulatory (OX40, CD28, 4-1BB) and coinhibitory molecules (PD-1, TIM-3, BTLA, CTLA-4, TIGIT, VISTA) as well as commonly used exhaustion markers (2B4, LAG-3, PD-1) was determined by flow cytometry and compared between CAR T cells with or without TCR KO (n = 3). (C) Cellular composition of CAR T cells was determined on day 14 (n = 4). A 2-tailed paired Student t test was performed to determine statistical significance. Tcm, CD62L+, CD45RO+, CD95+; Tem, CD62L−, CD45RO+, CD95+; Teff, CD62L−, CD45RO−, CD95+; Tn, CD62L+, CD45RO−, CD95−; Tscm, CD62L+, CD45RO−, CD95+. n.s., not significant; Tn, naïve T cells; Tscm, stem cell-like memory T cells.

Cellular characteristics of the final CAR–T-cell product. (A) The final product of CAR-expressing T cells showed mainly Tcm and Tem T cells regardless of TCR expression after expansion (n = 3). (B) Surface expression profile of several costimulatory (OX40, CD28, 4-1BB) and coinhibitory molecules (PD-1, TIM-3, BTLA, CTLA-4, TIGIT, VISTA) as well as commonly used exhaustion markers (2B4, LAG-3, PD-1) was determined by flow cytometry and compared between CAR T cells with or without TCR KO (n = 3). (C) Cellular composition of CAR T cells was determined on day 14 (n = 4). A 2-tailed paired Student t test was performed to determine statistical significance. Tcm, CD62L+, CD45RO+, CD95+; Tem, CD62L, CD45RO+, CD95+; Teff, CD62L, CD45RO, CD95+; Tn, CD62L+, CD45RO, CD95; Tscm, CD62L+, CD45RO, CD95+. n.s., not significant; Tn, naïve T cells; Tscm, stem cell-like memory T cells.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal