Figure 5.
Genes with aberrant CTCF occupancy and changed gene expression in AML. (A-D) Integrative Genomics Viewer tracks visualize CTCF peaks from ChIP-seq results of AMLall and NBM for 4 genes: ZBTB7A (A), DOT1L (B), PDCD1 (C), and FOSL2 (D). Green boxes indicate differentially bound peaks, and pink boxes indicate a CpG detected by the EPIC array that overlaps with a DBC peak. (E) Expression levels of the 4 genes in panels A-D from RNA-seq data (*FDR <0.05, fold change >1.5). (F) Box plot of β-values for the CpG in FOSL2 (*FDR <0.05). (G) Gene expression by quantitative PCR following CTCF knockdown in K562 cells. Relative gene expression was calculated using 2−ΔΔCt against GAPDH, while scramble control was set to 1 (dashed line) and knockdown was normalized against the scramble control (P < .05; Student t test). (H) Hypothetical model of aberrant CTCF binding and how it relates to DNA methylation and gene expression in AML. CHR, chromosome.

Genes with aberrant CTCF occupancy and changed gene expression in AML. (A-D) Integrative Genomics Viewer tracks visualize CTCF peaks from ChIP-seq results of AMLall and NBM for 4 genes: ZBTB7A (A), DOT1L (B), PDCD1 (C), and FOSL2 (D). Green boxes indicate differentially bound peaks, and pink boxes indicate a CpG detected by the EPIC array that overlaps with a DBC peak. (E) Expression levels of the 4 genes in panels A-D from RNA-seq data (*FDR <0.05, fold change >1.5). (F) Box plot of β-values for the CpG in FOSL2 (*FDR <0.05). (G) Gene expression by quantitative PCR following CTCF knockdown in K562 cells. Relative gene expression was calculated using 2−ΔΔCt against GAPDH, while scramble control was set to 1 (dashed line) and knockdown was normalized against the scramble control (P < .05; Student t test). (H) Hypothetical model of aberrant CTCF binding and how it relates to DNA methylation and gene expression in AML. CHR, chromosome.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal