Figure 2.
Impact of donor KIR2DS1 in C1-positive patients. This figure shows the cumulative incidences of relapse (left panels) and overall survival (right panels) of patients grouped according to their donors’ KIR2DS1-status (absence vs presence) and according to the patients’ C1/C2-ligand status. The upper panels show outcomes of C1-positive patients (ie, C1/C2 or C1/C1 patients). The lower panels show outcomes of C1/C2-positive patients only. This subgroup of patients whose leukemia cells express C2, the activating ligand for KIR2DS1, should have the greatest benefit of KIR2DS1-positive donors. Patients were classified according to the algorithm published by Venstrom et al18 in 2012. The HRs were calculated in multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for patient age, donor age, disease risk index, Karnofsky performance status, sex match, cytomegalovirus match, HLA match, conditioning intensity, T-cell depletion, and stem cell source. The P values represent the Wald tests.

Impact of donor KIR2DS1 in C1-positive patients. This figure shows the cumulative incidences of relapse (left panels) and overall survival (right panels) of patients grouped according to their donors’ KIR2DS1-status (absence vs presence) and according to the patients’ C1/C2-ligand status. The upper panels show outcomes of C1-positive patients (ie, C1/C2 or C1/C1 patients). The lower panels show outcomes of C1/C2-positive patients only. This subgroup of patients whose leukemia cells express C2, the activating ligand for KIR2DS1, should have the greatest benefit of KIR2DS1-positive donors. Patients were classified according to the algorithm published by Venstrom et al18  in 2012. The HRs were calculated in multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for patient age, donor age, disease risk index, Karnofsky performance status, sex match, cytomegalovirus match, HLA match, conditioning intensity, T-cell depletion, and stem cell source. The P values represent the Wald tests.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal