Figure 2.
Figure 2. Blockade of integrins αvβ3/αvβ5 increases ceramide in adherent endothelial cells, independent of cell detachment. (A) HBMECs (106 cells/10-cm plate) were allowed to spread on plates coated with vitronectin and blocked with 1% BSA. RGDfV (▪), RADfV (▨; 25 μg/mL), or vehicle control (□, DMSO) was added 2 hours after plating. Cells were labeled with [3H]palmitic acid at the time of addition of peptides. Following overnight incubation, cells were collected, lipids extracted, and [3H]ceramide was assessed by TLC as described in “Materials and methods.” Results are depicted as percent [3H]ceramide of total [3H]lipids extracted. Bars are means of 27 (vehicle), 31 (RADfV), or 33 (RGDfV) repeat experiments, each performed in triplicate. P < .001 between vehicle and RGDfV and between RADfV and RGDfV, but P = .085 between vehicle and the control peptide, RADfV. (B) Experiment was performed as in panel A; cells were collected at different time points; P = .004 by one-way ANOVA; n = 3. (C) Cells were labeled and treated, and lipids were extracted and resolved on TLC as in panel A. The TLC plate was exposed to film for 7 days. (D-E) HBMECs (106 cells/10-cm dish) were allowed to adhere for 2 hours to plates coated with BSA-blocked vitronectin (D-E); PLL that was blocked with 1% BSA (D); or PLL that was left unblocked (E). Cells were labeled with [3H]palmitic acid and treated with RGDfV (G; ▪) or RADfV (A; ▨; 25 μg/mL), or vehicle control (-; □). Ceramide was determined as in panel A. In panel D, P values on VN were vehicle versus RGDfV (P = .003) and RADfV versus RGDfV (P = .014). In vehicle control–treated cells on VN versus on PLL/BSA, P = .001, and RADfV on VN versus vehicle-control cells on PLL/BSA had P = .010. However, P value was not significant (P > .17 to .37) for all comparisons between RGDfV-treated cells on VN and any of the treatment conditions on PLL/BSA. In panel E, P values were as follows: VN versus PLL (vehicle controls, □), P = .291; vehicle versus RGDfV on VN, P = .001; RADfV versus RGDfV on VN, P = .001; and vehicle versus RGDfV on PLL, P = .021. P value for RGDfV-treated cells on VN versus PLL was not significant (P = .087). (F) HBMECs (106 per 10-cm plate) were incubated for 24 hours with C16-ceramide that was prepared as described in “Materials and methods.” They were then harvested, fixed, permeabilized, stained with propidium iodide, and analyzed by flow cytometry for the sub G0/G1 fraction. P < .001 by one-way ANOVA; n = 3. (G) Lysates from 0.3 × 106 control or ceramide-treated HBMECs incubated as in panel E were resolved by SDS-PAGE. PARP cleavage was assessed by Western blotting. Tubulin blot was used as loading control. Fold cleavage compared with control cells was calculated from the digitized images and corrected for tubulin.

Blockade of integrins αvβ3/αvβ5 increases ceramide in adherent endothelial cells, independent of cell detachment. (A) HBMECs (106 cells/10-cm plate) were allowed to spread on plates coated with vitronectin and blocked with 1% BSA. RGDfV (▪), RADfV (▨; 25 μg/mL), or vehicle control (□, DMSO) was added 2 hours after plating. Cells were labeled with [3H]palmitic acid at the time of addition of peptides. Following overnight incubation, cells were collected, lipids extracted, and [3H]ceramide was assessed by TLC as described in “Materials and methods.” Results are depicted as percent [3H]ceramide of total [3H]lipids extracted. Bars are means of 27 (vehicle), 31 (RADfV), or 33 (RGDfV) repeat experiments, each performed in triplicate. P < .001 between vehicle and RGDfV and between RADfV and RGDfV, but P = .085 between vehicle and the control peptide, RADfV. (B) Experiment was performed as in panel A; cells were collected at different time points; P = .004 by one-way ANOVA; n = 3. (C) Cells were labeled and treated, and lipids were extracted and resolved on TLC as in panel A. The TLC plate was exposed to film for 7 days. (D-E) HBMECs (106 cells/10-cm dish) were allowed to adhere for 2 hours to plates coated with BSA-blocked vitronectin (D-E); PLL that was blocked with 1% BSA (D); or PLL that was left unblocked (E). Cells were labeled with [3H]palmitic acid and treated with RGDfV (G; ▪) or RADfV (A; ▨; 25 μg/mL), or vehicle control (-; □). Ceramide was determined as in panel A. In panel D, P values on VN were vehicle versus RGDfV (P = .003) and RADfV versus RGDfV (P = .014). In vehicle control–treated cells on VN versus on PLL/BSA, P = .001, and RADfV on VN versus vehicle-control cells on PLL/BSA had P = .010. However, P value was not significant (P > .17 to .37) for all comparisons between RGDfV-treated cells on VN and any of the treatment conditions on PLL/BSA. In panel E, P values were as follows: VN versus PLL (vehicle controls, □), P = .291; vehicle versus RGDfV on VN, P = .001; RADfV versus RGDfV on VN, P = .001; and vehicle versus RGDfV on PLL, P = .021. P value for RGDfV-treated cells on VN versus PLL was not significant (P = .087). (F) HBMECs (106 per 10-cm plate) were incubated for 24 hours with C16-ceramide that was prepared as described in “Materials and methods.” They were then harvested, fixed, permeabilized, stained with propidium iodide, and analyzed by flow cytometry for the sub G0/G1 fraction. P < .001 by one-way ANOVA; n = 3. (G) Lysates from 0.3 × 106 control or ceramide-treated HBMECs incubated as in panel E were resolved by SDS-PAGE. PARP cleavage was assessed by Western blotting. Tubulin blot was used as loading control. Fold cleavage compared with control cells was calculated from the digitized images and corrected for tubulin.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal