Figure 2.
CCR6+CD25+CD4+ cells exhibit phenotypic and functional characteristics of Treg cells. (A) FACS analysis of markers characteristic for Treg cells. Four-color staining was carried out with lymph node cells from naive BALB/c mice. Cells were stained with antibodies specific for CD4, CD25, and CCR6 together with antibodies specific for either CD45RB, CD152, GITR, or CD122. Histograms are shown for the 4 CD4+ T-cell subsets CD25+CCR6+ (i), CD25+CCR6- (ii), CD25-CCR6+ (iii), and CD25-CCR6- (iv). Plots are generated by gating on the respective markers. Staining of CD152 was carried out intracellularly; gray areas represent here the isotype control. Vertical lines are inserted as reference for relative shifts. (B) Expression of CD103 and CCR6 on the CD25+CD4+ T-cell subsets. The dot plot shows the staining CD103 versus CCR6 for the population of lymph node cells gated on CD25+CD4+ cells. Numbers in each quadrant indicate the percentage fraction of the CD25+CD4+ T-cell population. Plots in panels A and B are representative for 3 independent experiments with cells pooled from 2 to 5 animals. (C) Expression of FoxP3. CD25-CCR6-, CD25-CCR6+, CD25+CCR6-, and CD25+CCR6+ lymph node cells were isolated by FACS and expression levels of FoxP3 were determined by real-time RT-PCR. CCR6- cells are represented by □, CCR6+ cells by ▦. Expression was determined in reference to HPRT and expression levels of FoxP3 are shown as fold increase compared to CD25-CCR6- T cells. The plot represents one of 4 independent experiments each with cells pooled from 8 to 10 mice. (D) Proliferative in vitro response of CCR6+CD25+ T cells. CCR6+CD25+ (▦) and CCR6-CD25+ CD4+ T cells (□) were stimulated in vitro with anti-CD3 and radiated APCs in the absence or presence of 20 U/mL IL-2. Proliferation was determined with 3H-thymidine. One of 2 independent experiments with cells pooled from each of 10 mice is shown. (E) Suppressive capacity. The ability to suppress proliferation of CD25-CD4+ splenocytes was tested with FACS populations of CD25+CD4+ lymph node cells differing in their CCR6 expression (left panel) and with CCR6+CD4+ lymph node cells differing in CD25 expression (right panel). CD25-CD4+ splenocytes were incubated in the presence of anti-CD3 and radiated APCs with titrated amounts of CCR6-CD25+CD4+ T cells (○ and dashed line) or CCR6+CD25+CD4+ T cells (• and solid line). Proliferation was determined with 3H-thymidine. The x-axis of the line plot indicates the ratio of CD25+CD4+ regulatory cells to CD25-CD4+ cells. Bars of the bar chart represent proliferation of CD25-CD4+ splenocytes alone and of CD25-CD4+ splenocytes incubated with CCR6+CD25+ or with CCR6+CD25- T cells at a ratio of 0.33. One of 3 independent experiments each with cells pooled from 8 to 10 mice is shown.

CCR6+CD25+CD4+ cells exhibit phenotypic and functional characteristics of Treg cells. (A) FACS analysis of markers characteristic for Treg cells. Four-color staining was carried out with lymph node cells from naive BALB/c mice. Cells were stained with antibodies specific for CD4, CD25, and CCR6 together with antibodies specific for either CD45RB, CD152, GITR, or CD122. Histograms are shown for the 4 CD4+ T-cell subsets CD25+CCR6+ (i), CD25+CCR6- (ii), CD25-CCR6+ (iii), and CD25-CCR6- (iv). Plots are generated by gating on the respective markers. Staining of CD152 was carried out intracellularly; gray areas represent here the isotype control. Vertical lines are inserted as reference for relative shifts. (B) Expression of CD103 and CCR6 on the CD25+CD4+ T-cell subsets. The dot plot shows the staining CD103 versus CCR6 for the population of lymph node cells gated on CD25+CD4+ cells. Numbers in each quadrant indicate the percentage fraction of the CD25+CD4+ T-cell population. Plots in panels A and B are representative for 3 independent experiments with cells pooled from 2 to 5 animals. (C) Expression of FoxP3. CD25-CCR6-, CD25-CCR6+, CD25+CCR6-, and CD25+CCR6+ lymph node cells were isolated by FACS and expression levels of FoxP3 were determined by real-time RT-PCR. CCR6- cells are represented by □, CCR6+ cells by ▦. Expression was determined in reference to HPRT and expression levels of FoxP3 are shown as fold increase compared to CD25-CCR6- T cells. The plot represents one of 4 independent experiments each with cells pooled from 8 to 10 mice. (D) Proliferative in vitro response of CCR6+CD25+ T cells. CCR6+CD25+ (▦) and CCR6-CD25+ CD4+ T cells (□) were stimulated in vitro with anti-CD3 and radiated APCs in the absence or presence of 20 U/mL IL-2. Proliferation was determined with 3H-thymidine. One of 2 independent experiments with cells pooled from each of 10 mice is shown. (E) Suppressive capacity. The ability to suppress proliferation of CD25-CD4+ splenocytes was tested with FACS populations of CD25+CD4+ lymph node cells differing in their CCR6 expression (left panel) and with CCR6+CD4+ lymph node cells differing in CD25 expression (right panel). CD25-CD4+ splenocytes were incubated in the presence of anti-CD3 and radiated APCs with titrated amounts of CCR6-CD25+CD4+ T cells (○ and dashed line) or CCR6+CD25+CD4+ T cells (• and solid line). Proliferation was determined with 3H-thymidine. The x-axis of the line plot indicates the ratio of CD25+CD4+ regulatory cells to CD25-CD4+ cells. Bars of the bar chart represent proliferation of CD25-CD4+ splenocytes alone and of CD25-CD4+ splenocytes incubated with CCR6+CD25+ or with CCR6+CD25- T cells at a ratio of 0.33. One of 3 independent experiments each with cells pooled from 8 to 10 mice is shown.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal