Figure 6.
Figure 6. Effects of IFN-γ neutralization on autoantibody production and deletion of donor CD4+ T cells and B cells. (A-D) cGVHD was induced by transferring 8 × 107 DBA/2 parental cells into BDF1 mice, and 3H3 or control Ig was administered immediately afterward. (A) Three days later, splenocytes were harvested and stimulated with PMA/ionomycin. Twenty-four hours thereafter, the concentration of IFN-γ in culture supernatants was measured. (B-D) Serum was harvested from cGVHD mice at days 3 (B), 7 (C), and 14 (D) after disease induction. Serum IFN-γ levels were measured by ELISA. ND indicates not detectable. Data are presented as means ± SD of n = 3-4 per group. *P < .05 between the 2 groups. (E-I) Starting from day 2, 500 μg anti–IFN-γ mAb was administered to cGVHD mice every 4 days. On day 14, serum and splenocytes were harvested from the cGVHD mice. (E) OD values for anti-DNA IgG1 levels are shown as means ± SD at 10-fold dilution of samples. (F-G) Donor CD4+ T-cell and B-cell numbers were counted by staining splenocytes with anti–H-2Kb plus anti-CD4 (F) or anti-B220 (G), respectively. (H) Autoreactive B cells producing anti-DNA IgG1 were counted using ELISPOT. (I) Splenocytes were triple-stained with anti–H-2Kb, anti-CD4, and anti-CD62L, and H-2Kb–negative CD4+ T cells were gated and analyzed for CD62L expression. Representative FACS plots are shown in the left column, and percentages of CD62Llow versus CD62Lhigh donor CD4+ T cells are summarized in the right column. Data are presented as means ± SD of n = 3-5 per group. *P < .05 between the control Ig–treated group without neutralization and the indicated group (E, F, H), or between the indicated groups (G).

Effects of IFN-γ neutralization on autoantibody production and deletion of donor CD4+ T cells and B cells. (A-D) cGVHD was induced by transferring 8 × 107 DBA/2 parental cells into BDF1 mice, and 3H3 or control Ig was administered immediately afterward. (A) Three days later, splenocytes were harvested and stimulated with PMA/ionomycin. Twenty-four hours thereafter, the concentration of IFN-γ in culture supernatants was measured. (B-D) Serum was harvested from cGVHD mice at days 3 (B), 7 (C), and 14 (D) after disease induction. Serum IFN-γ levels were measured by ELISA. ND indicates not detectable. Data are presented as means ± SD of n = 3-4 per group. *P < .05 between the 2 groups. (E-I) Starting from day 2, 500 μg anti–IFN-γ mAb was administered to cGVHD mice every 4 days. On day 14, serum and splenocytes were harvested from the cGVHD mice. (E) OD values for anti-DNA IgG1 levels are shown as means ± SD at 10-fold dilution of samples. (F-G) Donor CD4+ T-cell and B-cell numbers were counted by staining splenocytes with anti–H-2Kb plus anti-CD4 (F) or anti-B220 (G), respectively. (H) Autoreactive B cells producing anti-DNA IgG1 were counted using ELISPOT. (I) Splenocytes were triple-stained with anti–H-2Kb, anti-CD4, and anti-CD62L, and H-2Kb–negative CD4+ T cells were gated and analyzed for CD62L expression. Representative FACS plots are shown in the left column, and percentages of CD62Llow versus CD62Lhigh donor CD4+ T cells are summarized in the right column. Data are presented as means ± SD of n = 3-5 per group. *P < .05 between the control Ig–treated group without neutralization and the indicated group (E, F, H), or between the indicated groups (G).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal