Figure 1.
Figure 1. EphB4 gene expression indicated by β-galactosidase activity within EBs. (A) Two clones of each EphB4+/– (EphB4+/–1 and EphB4+/–2) and EphB4–/– ES cells (EphB4–/–1 and EphB4–/–2) were induced for EB differentiation for 4 days and analyzed for gene expression by RT-PCR. (B) Kinetics of β-gal expression in EphB4+/– EBs. EphB4+/– ES cells were allowed to differentiate into EBs in suspension cultures in Petri dishes. EB cells at day 2, 4, 7, and 9 were harvested, stained with FDG for β-galactosidase activity, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Dead cells were gated out by a DNA dye, DAPI, staining (data not shown). (C) Flow cytometric analysis of β-gal expression (β-gal+ cells) in day-4 EBs from control (wild-type), EphB4+/– and EphB4–/– ES cells. (D) X-gal staining β-galactosidase activity in day EBs was analyzed by staining with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl b-galactoside (X-gal). Original magnification, × 4.

EphB4 gene expression indicated by β-galactosidase activity within EBs. (A) Two clones of each EphB4+/ (EphB4+/1 and EphB4+/2) and EphB4/ ES cells (EphB4/1 and EphB4/2) were induced for EB differentiation for 4 days and analyzed for gene expression by RT-PCR. (B) Kinetics of β-gal expression in EphB4+/ EBs. EphB4+/ ES cells were allowed to differentiate into EBs in suspension cultures in Petri dishes. EB cells at day 2, 4, 7, and 9 were harvested, stained with FDG for β-galactosidase activity, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Dead cells were gated out by a DNA dye, DAPI, staining (data not shown). (C) Flow cytometric analysis of β-gal expression (β-gal+ cells) in day-4 EBs from control (wild-type), EphB4+/ and EphB4/ ES cells. (D) X-gal staining β-galactosidase activity in day EBs was analyzed by staining with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl b-galactoside (X-gal). Original magnification, × 4.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal