Figure 1.
Competitive repopulation advantage of WT versus WASP— stem cells in WASP— mice following transplantation. WASP— mice received transplants of varying percentages of Ly5.1(WT) cells as follows: 10% (▵), 20% (○ and •), or 50% (♦), with the remainder of cells transplanted being Ly5.2(WASP—) cells (top row). For control mixtures, WT (littermate) Ly5.2 bone marrow cells were substituted for WASP— cells (bottom row). The mixture of 20% WT versus 80% WASP— cells was performed in 2 sets of animals. Peripheral blood was obtained at the times indicated and analyzed by flow cytometry using a monoclonal antibody specific for the Ly5.1 epitope. T-cell marker: Thy 1.2. B-cell marker: B-220. Neutrophils were gated by forward versus side scatter. Monocytes were also gated by forward versus side scatter, with backgating to minimize lymphocyte (B220+ or Thy 1.2+) contamination. Each data point represents the mean and standard errors of data obtained from 4 to 6 animals.

Competitive repopulation advantage of WT versus WASP stem cells in WASP mice following transplantation. WASP mice received transplants of varying percentages of Ly5.1(WT) cells as follows: 10% (▵), 20% (○ and •), or 50% (♦), with the remainder of cells transplanted being Ly5.2(WASP) cells (top row). For control mixtures, WT (littermate) Ly5.2 bone marrow cells were substituted for WASP cells (bottom row). The mixture of 20% WT versus 80% WASP cells was performed in 2 sets of animals. Peripheral blood was obtained at the times indicated and analyzed by flow cytometry using a monoclonal antibody specific for the Ly5.1 epitope. T-cell marker: Thy 1.2. B-cell marker: B-220. Neutrophils were gated by forward versus side scatter. Monocytes were also gated by forward versus side scatter, with backgating to minimize lymphocyte (B220+ or Thy 1.2+) contamination. Each data point represents the mean and standard errors of data obtained from 4 to 6 animals.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal