Figure 2.
Figure 2. Forskolin and IBMX, 2 cAMP inducers, are potent inducers of CXCR4 expression on HMECs. (A) HMECs were stimulated with forskolin (1 μM), IBMX (0.02 mM), or PGE2(10–9 M) for 24 hours. Thereafter, the cell surface expression of CXCR4 was analyzed. As depicted by the histograms, CXCR4 expression (thick histograms) was enhanced by IBMX, forskolin, or PGE2 relative to the basal expression of CXCR4 on these cells. The background level of fluorescence in the presence of mouse IgG2a control is depicted by the thin histograms. A representative experiment of 3 is shown. (B) A comparison of MFI of PGE2-, dorskolin-, and IBMX-stimulated HMECs indicated that IBMX and forskolin induce up to a 6-fold increment of CXCR4 in relation to the basal CXCR4 expression, and about a 1.5-fold increment in relation to PGE2 stimulation. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA relative to the basal expression of CXCR4 on HMECs. The mean + SEM of 3 experiments is shown. *P < .01.

Forskolin and IBMX, 2 cAMP inducers, are potent inducers of CXCR4 expression on HMECs. (A) HMECs were stimulated with forskolin (1 μM), IBMX (0.02 mM), or PGE2(10–9 M) for 24 hours. Thereafter, the cell surface expression of CXCR4 was analyzed. As depicted by the histograms, CXCR4 expression (thick histograms) was enhanced by IBMX, forskolin, or PGE2 relative to the basal expression of CXCR4 on these cells. The background level of fluorescence in the presence of mouse IgG2a control is depicted by the thin histograms. A representative experiment of 3 is shown. (B) A comparison of MFI of PGE2-, dorskolin-, and IBMX-stimulated HMECs indicated that IBMX and forskolin induce up to a 6-fold increment of CXCR4 in relation to the basal CXCR4 expression, and about a 1.5-fold increment in relation to PGE2 stimulation. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA relative to the basal expression of CXCR4 on HMECs. The mean + SEM of 3 experiments is shown. *P < .01.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal