Figure 3.
Figure 3. Overall survival of patients stratified by the hierarchic classification model proposed by our study. The survival curves show clear separation of patients into the good, intermediate, and poor prognosis category, a difference that was statistically significant. Groups were formed by the stratification according to the presence or absence of specific genetic abnormalities. The poor prognosis group includes patients with – 17p13.1, t(4;14)(p13;q32), and/or t(14;16)(q32;q23); the intermediate prognosis group includes those patients with Δ13 who did not have the aforementioned abnormalities; and the good prognosis group includes remaining patients, including those with the t(11;14)(q13;q32) and none of the aforementioned abnormalities.

Overall survival of patients stratified by the hierarchic classification model proposed by our study. The survival curves show clear separation of patients into the good, intermediate, and poor prognosis category, a difference that was statistically significant. Groups were formed by the stratification according to the presence or absence of specific genetic abnormalities. The poor prognosis group includes patients with – 17p13.1, t(4;14)(p13;q32), and/or t(14;16)(q32;q23); the intermediate prognosis group includes those patients with Δ13 who did not have the aforementioned abnormalities; and the good prognosis group includes remaining patients, including those with the t(11;14)(q13;q32) and none of the aforementioned abnormalities.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal