Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. The p40phox PU.1 sites bind PU.1 with different avidity. / (A) EMSA of the p40phox PU.1 sites with varied amounts of the DNA probes. Increasing amounts of the32P-labeled PU.1 DNA probes having comparable specific activities of labeling were incubated with in vitro–synthesized PU.1 protein and then analyzed by PAGE. The major PU.1-DNA complex is indicated by the arrow. (B) Competition between oligonucleotides corresponding to the p40phox PU.1 binding sites and a 32P-labeled PU.1 DNA probe (5′-CAAAAGCGACTTCCTCTTTCCAGTGC-3′) from thep47phox promoter for binding to PU.1 protein in HL-60 nuclear extracts. Fixed amounts of HL-60 nuclear extract and 32P-labeledp47phox PU.1 probe were incubated in the presence of the indicated amounts of the unlabeledp40phox oligonucleotides. Specificity of the PU.1-DNA complex indicated by the arrow was confirmed by supershift assay with antibodies to human PU.1 (data not shown).

The p40phox PU.1 sites bind PU.1 with different avidity.

(A) EMSA of the p40phox PU.1 sites with varied amounts of the DNA probes. Increasing amounts of the32P-labeled PU.1 DNA probes having comparable specific activities of labeling were incubated with in vitro–synthesized PU.1 protein and then analyzed by PAGE. The major PU.1-DNA complex is indicated by the arrow. (B) Competition between oligonucleotides corresponding to the p40phox PU.1 binding sites and a 32P-labeled PU.1 DNA probe (5′-CAAAAGCGACTTCCTCTTTCCAGTGC-3′) from thep47phox promoter for binding to PU.1 protein in HL-60 nuclear extracts. Fixed amounts of HL-60 nuclear extract and 32P-labeledp47phox PU.1 probe were incubated in the presence of the indicated amounts of the unlabeledp40phoxoligonucleotides. Specificity of the PU.1-DNA complex indicated by the arrow was confirmed by supershift assay with antibodies to human PU.1 (data not shown).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal