Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Flow cytometric analysis of intracytoplasmic MBP in MCs and eosinophils. / Representative results obtained with permeabilized CB-derived MCs (A) and eosinophils (B) are shown. The histograms indicated as shaded areas with bold lines were obtained using the anti-MBP MoAb (BMK-13), whereas those indicated as open areas with thin lines were obtained using control antibody. The experiments using another anti-MBP MoAb (AHE-2) derived from a different hybridoma gave similar histograms. The mean fluorescence intensity ratios of MBP to control in PB- and CB-derived MCs and eosinophils were, respectively, 14.3 ± 2.1 (n = 10) and 2.4 ± 0.5 (n = 3). The levels of coefficient of variation for MCs and eosinophils were, respectively, 86.2% ± 6.4% and 37.4% ± 5.3% (n = 10 and n = 3), indicating that the intensities of MBP fluorescence in MCs varied widely compared with those in eosinophils.

Flow cytometric analysis of intracytoplasmic MBP in MCs and eosinophils.

Representative results obtained with permeabilized CB-derived MCs (A) and eosinophils (B) are shown. The histograms indicated as shaded areas with bold lines were obtained using the anti-MBP MoAb (BMK-13), whereas those indicated as open areas with thin lines were obtained using control antibody. The experiments using another anti-MBP MoAb (AHE-2) derived from a different hybridoma gave similar histograms. The mean fluorescence intensity ratios of MBP to control in PB- and CB-derived MCs and eosinophils were, respectively, 14.3 ± 2.1 (n = 10) and 2.4 ± 0.5 (n = 3). The levels of coefficient of variation for MCs and eosinophils were, respectively, 86.2% ± 6.4% and 37.4% ± 5.3% (n = 10 and n = 3), indicating that the intensities of MBP fluorescence in MCs varied widely compared with those in eosinophils.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal