Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Reduced pluripotent progenitor numbers and clonogenic potential in Pbx1−/− FL. / (A) Representative FACS profiles of wt (left) andPbx1−/− (right) FL at E14.5 show a relative increase in frequency of lin−Sca-1+c-Kit+ cells inPbx1−/− FL. Note that the absolute numbers of lin−Sca-1+c-Kit+AA4.1+cells per FL, however, are reduced (wt = 2.8 × 104cells per FL; Pbx1−/− = 1.6 × 104 cells per FL). Results are shown for single animals of each genotype. (B) In vitro clonogenic potential is shown for HSC-enriched pluripotent progenitors, which were purified by 2 rounds of FACS analysis of cells from 4 pooled FLs of each genotype by means of the FACS gates shown in panel A. (C) Day-8 CFU-S frequency for purified Pbx1−/− andPbx1+/−lin−Sca-1+c-Kit+ cells injected into irradiated wt recipients. Data were obtained from a single experiment (representative of 2) on cells (with 4 or more pooled FLs of each genotype) purified by 2 rounds of FACS sorting by means of the gates shown in panel A.

Reduced pluripotent progenitor numbers and clonogenic potential in Pbx1−/− FL.

(A) Representative FACS profiles of wt (left) andPbx1−/−(right) FL at E14.5 show a relative increase in frequency of linSca-1+c-Kit+ cells inPbx1−/−FL. Note that the absolute numbers of linSca-1+c-Kit+AA4.1+cells per FL, however, are reduced (wt = 2.8 × 104cells per FL; Pbx1−/−= 1.6 × 104 cells per FL). Results are shown for single animals of each genotype. (B) In vitro clonogenic potential is shown for HSC-enriched pluripotent progenitors, which were purified by 2 rounds of FACS analysis of cells from 4 pooled FLs of each genotype by means of the FACS gates shown in panel A. (C) Day-8 CFU-S frequency for purified Pbx1−/−andPbx1+/−linSca-1+c-Kit+ cells injected into irradiated wt recipients. Data were obtained from a single experiment (representative of 2) on cells (with 4 or more pooled FLs of each genotype) purified by 2 rounds of FACS sorting by means of the gates shown in panel A.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal