Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. MCHC and p50 versus osmolarity. / (A) Measurement of intracellular CSAT by plotting p50 versus extracellular osmolarity for AA, SS, and AS red cells. (B) Determination of MCHC at the onset of polymer formation for SS red cells by plotting MCHC versus extracellular osmolarity. MCHC and p50 for representative patients with AA, AS, and SS. As expected, patient-to-patient variation was observed (data not shown). The CSAT for SS red cells can also be estimated from the intersection of the SS p50 line with the horizontal line because the p50 values of HbA and HbS were the same in the absence of polymer formation. Intracellular CSAT for this patient, who had 9.7% HbF, was 18.2 g/dL. The patient with AS did not have the α-thalassemia trait and had an estimated CSAT of 32.2 g/dL. Under fully deoxygenated conditions, the traditional method of measuring CSAT yielded values of 15.8 g/dL for purified SS.5

MCHC and p50 versus osmolarity.

(A) Measurement of intracellular CSAT by plotting p50 versus extracellular osmolarity for AA, SS, and AS red cells. (B) Determination of MCHC at the onset of polymer formation for SS red cells by plotting MCHC versus extracellular osmolarity. MCHC and p50 for representative patients with AA, AS, and SS. As expected, patient-to-patient variation was observed (data not shown). The CSAT for SS red cells can also be estimated from the intersection of the SS p50 line with the horizontal line because the p50 values of HbA and HbS were the same in the absence of polymer formation. Intracellular CSAT for this patient, who had 9.7% HbF, was 18.2 g/dL. The patient with AS did not have the α-thalassemia trait and had an estimated CSAT of 32.2 g/dL. Under fully deoxygenated conditions, the traditional method of measuring CSAT yielded values of 15.8 g/dL for purified SS.5 

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal