Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Adhesion of hemopoietic cells to ICAM4Fc is α4β1-mediated, and adhesion to nonhemopoietic cells is αV integrin–mediated. / Adhesion assays were as described in “Materials and methods.” (A) Adhesion of cation-activated, hemopoietic, HEL cells to ICAM4Fc in the presence of blocking (b) or activating (a) antibodies to integrin α or β subunits as described in “Materials and methods.” Results are cells bound ± SD (n = 6), in comparison with control antibody (C, 100%). Antibodies used were β1b, clone 13; β1a, TS2/16; β2b, MHM23; β3b, RUU-PL; α1, FB12; α2, JA218; α3, C3(VLA3); α4b, HP2/1; α4a, 44H6; α5b, SNAKA55; α6b, NKI-GoH3; and αV b, 69.9.5. ICAM4Fc was coated at 0.5 μg/well. (B) Comparison of the relative avidity of adhesion of cation-activated HEL cells to VCAMFc (diamonds), MAdCAMFc (triangles), ICAM4Fc (squares), and NCAMFc (crosses) by titration of CAMFc protein as described in “Materials and methods.” Results are input cells bound ± SD (n = 6). (C) Adhesion of cation-activated β1-negative JY cells and HEL cells to VCAMFc, MAdCAMFc, ICAM4FcFc, and NCAMFc. Fc fusion proteins were coated at 0.05 μg/well (VCAMFc, MAdCAMFc) and 1 μg/well (ICAM4Fc, NCAMFc). Results are the percentage of input cells bound ± SD (n = 6). (D) Adhesion of PMA+ cation–activated, nonhemopoietic, FLY cells to ICAM4Fc in the presence of blocking antibodies to integrin α or β subunits or integrin complexes as described in “Materials and methods.” Results are cells bound ± SD (n = 6), in comparison with control antibody (C, 100%). Blocking antibodies were as above except β4, ASC-3; αVβ3, LM609; and αVβ5, P1F6. ICAM4Fc was coated at 0.25 μg/well.

Adhesion of hemopoietic cells to ICAM4Fc is α4β1-mediated, and adhesion to nonhemopoietic cells is αV integrin–mediated.

Adhesion assays were as described in “Materials and methods.” (A) Adhesion of cation-activated, hemopoietic, HEL cells to ICAM4Fc in the presence of blocking (b) or activating (a) antibodies to integrin α or β subunits as described in “Materials and methods.” Results are cells bound ± SD (n = 6), in comparison with control antibody (C, 100%). Antibodies used were β1b, clone 13; β1a, TS2/16; β2b, MHM23; β3b, RUU-PL; α1, FB12; α2, JA218; α3, C3(VLA3); α4b, HP2/1; α4a, 44H6; α5b, SNAKA55; α6b, NKI-GoH3; and αV b, 69.9.5. ICAM4Fc was coated at 0.5 μg/well. (B) Comparison of the relative avidity of adhesion of cation-activated HEL cells to VCAMFc (diamonds), MAdCAMFc (triangles), ICAM4Fc (squares), and NCAMFc (crosses) by titration of CAMFc protein as described in “Materials and methods.” Results are input cells bound ± SD (n = 6). (C) Adhesion of cation-activated β1-negative JY cells and HEL cells to VCAMFc, MAdCAMFc, ICAM4FcFc, and NCAMFc. Fc fusion proteins were coated at 0.05 μg/well (VCAMFc, MAdCAMFc) and 1 μg/well (ICAM4Fc, NCAMFc). Results are the percentage of input cells bound ± SD (n = 6). (D) Adhesion of PMA+ cation–activated, nonhemopoietic, FLY cells to ICAM4Fc in the presence of blocking antibodies to integrin α or β subunits or integrin complexes as described in “Materials and methods.” Results are cells bound ± SD (n = 6), in comparison with control antibody (C, 100%). Blocking antibodies were as above except β4, ASC-3; αVβ3, LM609; and αVβ5, P1F6. ICAM4Fc was coated at 0.25 μg/well.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal