Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Recovery and adhesion of peritoneal macrophages. / (A) The effect of EDTA on the recovery of peritoneal macrophages. The proportion of Mac-1hiCD5− macrophages harvested from the peritoneum of wt (+/+) orLsp1−/−(−/−) mice with or without 5 mmol/L EDTA in the lavage buffer are shown. Data are presented as mean values ± 1 SEM from 3 mice per genotype (+EDTA) and 8 or 9 mice (wt orLsp1−/−, respectively, −EDTA). *,P = .008, **, P = .0003. (B) Adhesion of the peritoneal macrophages to fibronectin in vitro. F4/80+macrophages from wt and Lsp1−/− mice adhered to fibronectin-coated coverslips were counted within a defined area as described in “Materials and methods.” Data are presented as means ± 1 SEM from 4 mice per genotype.

Recovery and adhesion of peritoneal macrophages.

(A) The effect of EDTA on the recovery of peritoneal macrophages. The proportion of Mac-1hiCD5 macrophages harvested from the peritoneum of wt (+/+) orLsp1−/−(−/−) mice with or without 5 mmol/L EDTA in the lavage buffer are shown. Data are presented as mean values ± 1 SEM from 3 mice per genotype (+EDTA) and 8 or 9 mice (wt orLsp1−/−, respectively, −EDTA). *,P = .008, **, P = .0003. (B) Adhesion of the peritoneal macrophages to fibronectin in vitro. F4/80+macrophages from wt and Lsp1−/−mice adhered to fibronectin-coated coverslips were counted within a defined area as described in “Materials and methods.” Data are presented as means ± 1 SEM from 4 mice per genotype.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal