Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Colocalization of tPA with vWF and GH. (A) tPA versus vWF. Uninfected HUVEC were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with biotinylated sheep anti-tPA antibody followed by rhodamine-conjugated avidin and then FITC-conjugated goat anti-vWF. (B) tPA versus GH. GHrAd-infected HUVEC were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with biotinylated sheep anti-tPA and rabbit anti-GH antibodies, followed by rhodamine-conjugated avidin and then FITC-conjugated antirabbit antibody. Scanning confocal microscopy images were obtained at 0.36-μm intervals in the Z-axis using a 100× objective. Shown are representative scans from the approximate midsection of the Z-axis. The red and green images were merged to demonstrate colocalization, which appears yellow.

Colocalization of tPA with vWF and GH. (A) tPA versus vWF. Uninfected HUVEC were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with biotinylated sheep anti-tPA antibody followed by rhodamine-conjugated avidin and then FITC-conjugated goat anti-vWF. (B) tPA versus GH. GHrAd-infected HUVEC were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with biotinylated sheep anti-tPA and rabbit anti-GH antibodies, followed by rhodamine-conjugated avidin and then FITC-conjugated antirabbit antibody. Scanning confocal microscopy images were obtained at 0.36-μm intervals in the Z-axis using a 100× objective. Shown are representative scans from the approximate midsection of the Z-axis. The red and green images were merged to demonstrate colocalization, which appears yellow.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal