Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Southern blot analysis. Genomic DNAs extracted from 6 PMBLs (no. 12, 6, 7, 11, 10, and 5) and 3 peripheral DLBLs (no. 15, 19, and 14) were subjected to EcoRI digestion, agarose gel electrophoresis, Nylon N+ membrane transfer, and hybridization with 2 MAL probes. (A) The physical map of the MAL gene and localization of the 2 probes are represented at the top of the figure. The boxes represent the exons, which are not drawn to scale for the clarity of the figure. (B) A 1.5-kb EcoRI-HindIII fragment (probe a) exploring the 5′ part of the MAL gene showed the same 17-kb DNA fragment in all samples. (C) A PCR-generated fragment of MAL cDNA (probe b) spanning exons 2, 3, and 4 showed 2 DNA fragments of 5 and 2.6 kb. The faint bands observed for case no. 5 in (B) and (C) are due to the lower amount of DNA loaded on the gel. However, longer autoradiographic expositions demonstrated the same DNA fragments in this sample.

Southern blot analysis. Genomic DNAs extracted from 6 PMBLs (no. 12, 6, 7, 11, 10, and 5) and 3 peripheral DLBLs (no. 15, 19, and 14) were subjected to EcoRI digestion, agarose gel electrophoresis, Nylon N+ membrane transfer, and hybridization with 2 MAL probes. (A) The physical map of the MAL gene and localization of the 2 probes are represented at the top of the figure. The boxes represent the exons, which are not drawn to scale for the clarity of the figure. (B) A 1.5-kb EcoRI-HindIII fragment (probe a) exploring the 5′ part of the MAL gene showed the same 17-kb DNA fragment in all samples. (C) A PCR-generated fragment of MAL cDNA (probe b) spanning exons 2, 3, and 4 showed 2 DNA fragments of 5 and 2.6 kb. The faint bands observed for case no. 5 in (B) and (C) are due to the lower amount of DNA loaded on the gel. However, longer autoradiographic expositions demonstrated the same DNA fragments in this sample.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal