Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Influence of Zn2+ on VN binding to uPAR. (A) Binding of 125I-VN to U937 cells was performed in the absence or presence of 50 μmol/L Zn2+ or 20 nmol/L uPA alone or added together as indicated. Data (mean ± SEM, n = 3) are expressed as specific binding (as determined by subtracting binding in the presence of excess unlabeled VN). (B) Binding of125I-VN to immobilized uPAR was performed in the absence or presence of 50 μmol/L Zn2+ or 20 nmol/L uPA, respectively. Either no additives (▩) or 20 μg/mL MoAb R3 against uPAR (▨), 500 μmol/L 1-10-phenanthroline (), or 100 nmol/L PAI-1 (▤) were included as competitors. Data (mean ± SEM, n = 3) are expressed as specific binding (represented as percent of control). Similar results were obtained in at least three separate experiments.

Influence of Zn2+ on VN binding to uPAR. (A) Binding of 125I-VN to U937 cells was performed in the absence or presence of 50 μmol/L Zn2+ or 20 nmol/L uPA alone or added together as indicated. Data (mean ± SEM, n = 3) are expressed as specific binding (as determined by subtracting binding in the presence of excess unlabeled VN). (B) Binding of125I-VN to immobilized uPAR was performed in the absence or presence of 50 μmol/L Zn2+ or 20 nmol/L uPA, respectively. Either no additives (▩) or 20 μg/mL MoAb R3 against uPAR (▨), 500 μmol/L 1-10-phenanthroline (), or 100 nmol/L PAI-1 (▤) were included as competitors. Data (mean ± SEM, n = 3) are expressed as specific binding (represented as percent of control). Similar results were obtained in at least three separate experiments.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal