Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Comparision of DC numbers identified as either lin− HLA-DR+ cells (before culture) or as CMRF44+ CD14− CD19− cells (after overnight culture). (A) The mean numbers of lin−HLA-DR+ cells and CMRF44+DC were both reduced in patients (n = 13) compared with normal individuals (n = 11). (B) The relatively constant relationship between the numbers of CMRF44+ DC and lin−HLA-DR+ cells seen in normal individuals (where CMRF44+ DC typically account for 40% to 80% of lin− HLA-DR+ cells) is not seen in the patient group (CMRF44+ DC account for 5% to 95% of the lin− HLA-DR+ cells). (C) The use of CMRF44 or CD83 to identify DC was compared in both normals (n = 5) and patients (n = 16). A strong correlation (r2= 0.89) was found between the DC numbers measured using CMRF44 or CD83.

Comparision of DC numbers identified as either lin HLA-DR+ cells (before culture) or as CMRF44+ CD14 CD19 cells (after overnight culture). (A) The mean numbers of linHLA-DR+ cells and CMRF44+DC were both reduced in patients (n = 13) compared with normal individuals (n = 11). (B) The relatively constant relationship between the numbers of CMRF44+ DC and linHLA-DR+ cells seen in normal individuals (where CMRF44+ DC typically account for 40% to 80% of lin HLA-DR+ cells) is not seen in the patient group (CMRF44+ DC account for 5% to 95% of the lin HLA-DR+ cells). (C) The use of CMRF44 or CD83 to identify DC was compared in both normals (n = 5) and patients (n = 16). A strong correlation (r2= 0.89) was found between the DC numbers measured using CMRF44 or CD83.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal