Figure 3.
Figure 3. PMos uptake sickle RBCs in vivo. (A) Schematic representation of experimental design. WT mice or CD11a−/− mice were transfused with DiI-labeled RBCs from sickle Townes or control HbAA mice. At 20 hours after transfusion, mice were injected IV with freshly prepared hemin and analyzed 4 hours later. (B) Representative dot plots comparing DiI+ PMos (CD45+CD11b+Ly-6G-CD115+Ly-6C−) and CMo (CD45+CD11b+Ly-6G-CD115+Ly-6C+) from WT mice. For the gating strategy used, see supplemental Figure 4B. (C) Frequencies of DiI+ circulating leukocyte subsets in WT mice (n = 8) and CD11a−/− mice (n = 8). (D) Schematic representation of experimental design; Nr4a1-GFP mice received treatment as shown in panel A and were analyzed with immunofluorescence following perfusion with PBS to wash out nonattached circulating blood cells. (E) Representative immunofluorescence images showing the uptake of DiI+ RBCs by GFP+ PMos on the endothelial surface of liver and lung in mice that received DiI-labeled sickle RBCs or control RBCs. CD31/CD144 (endothelial markers, blue), DiI (RBC in red), and GFP (PMo, green). Scale bar, 5 µm. (F) The frequencies of GFP+ PMos with uptake of DiI+ RBC (DiI+ GFP+ PMos) in mice as shown in panel E. (G) Representative IFC images acquired and gated on DiI+ PMos from hemin-treated Nr4a1-GFP reporter mice. Left to right: single-channel BF, GFP (representing PMos in green), DiI (representing sickle RBC material in red), CD45 (representing surface PMos in purple), and merged images showing DiI+ materials within GFP+CD45+ PMos. (H) Histogram depicting degree of DiI+ material internalized within GFP+ PMos with internalization score (<0 represents DiI+ material attached to the surface of PMo; >0 represents DiI+ material internalized by PMos). Percentage of cells with an internalization score >0 is indicated. Data represent mean ± SEM; means were compared using a 2-tailed Student t test. **P < .01; ***P < .001.

PMos uptake sickle RBCs in vivo. (A) Schematic representation of experimental design. WT mice or CD11a−/− mice were transfused with DiI-labeled RBCs from sickle Townes or control HbAA mice. At 20 hours after transfusion, mice were injected IV with freshly prepared hemin and analyzed 4 hours later. (B) Representative dot plots comparing DiI+ PMos (CD45+CD11b+Ly-6G-CD115+Ly-6C) and CMo (CD45+CD11b+Ly-6G-CD115+Ly-6C+) from WT mice. For the gating strategy used, see supplemental Figure 4B. (C) Frequencies of DiI+ circulating leukocyte subsets in WT mice (n = 8) and CD11a−/− mice (n = 8). (D) Schematic representation of experimental design; Nr4a1-GFP mice received treatment as shown in panel A and were analyzed with immunofluorescence following perfusion with PBS to wash out nonattached circulating blood cells. (E) Representative immunofluorescence images showing the uptake of DiI+ RBCs by GFP+ PMos on the endothelial surface of liver and lung in mice that received DiI-labeled sickle RBCs or control RBCs. CD31/CD144 (endothelial markers, blue), DiI (RBC in red), and GFP (PMo, green). Scale bar, 5 µm. (F) The frequencies of GFP+ PMos with uptake of DiI+ RBC (DiI+ GFP+ PMos) in mice as shown in panel E. (G) Representative IFC images acquired and gated on DiI+ PMos from hemin-treated Nr4a1-GFP reporter mice. Left to right: single-channel BF, GFP (representing PMos in green), DiI (representing sickle RBC material in red), CD45 (representing surface PMos in purple), and merged images showing DiI+ materials within GFP+CD45+ PMos. (H) Histogram depicting degree of DiI+ material internalized within GFP+ PMos with internalization score (<0 represents DiI+ material attached to the surface of PMo; >0 represents DiI+ material internalized by PMos). Percentage of cells with an internalization score >0 is indicated. Data represent mean ± SEM; means were compared using a 2-tailed Student t test. **P < .01; ***P < .001.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal