Figure 6.
The impact of deleting GRK6 on Ca2+release in MEG-01 cells. (A) MEG-01 cells were loaded with fluo-4 AM, and the cells were stimulated with thrombin (n = 6), PAR1-AP (n = 5), PAR4-AP (n = 8), U46619 (n = 5), or collagen (n = 3), and changes of Ca2+ were recorded. (Ai) The representative trace of Ca2+ response in response to agonists. (Aii) The bar graph summarizes 3 to 8 experiments, respectively (mean ± SEM). (Bi) PAR1 surface expression in WT vs GRK6−/− MEG-01 cells in unstimulated (left) or in response to thrombin stimulation (right), and (Bii) the percentage decrease in PAR1 surface expression in WT and GRK6−/− MEG-01 cells after stimulation (N = 3). An anti-PAR1 antibody (ATAP2), which recognizes cleaved as well as intact PAR1 receptors, was used to detect PAR1 surface expression by flow cytometry.

The impact of deleting GRK6 on Ca2+release in MEG-01 cells. (A) MEG-01 cells were loaded with fluo-4 AM, and the cells were stimulated with thrombin (n = 6), PAR1-AP (n = 5), PAR4-AP (n = 8), U46619 (n = 5), or collagen (n = 3), and changes of Ca2+ were recorded. (Ai) The representative trace of Ca2+ response in response to agonists. (Aii) The bar graph summarizes 3 to 8 experiments, respectively (mean ± SEM). (Bi) PAR1 surface expression in WT vs GRK6−/− MEG-01 cells in unstimulated (left) or in response to thrombin stimulation (right), and (Bii) the percentage decrease in PAR1 surface expression in WT and GRK6−/− MEG-01 cells after stimulation (N = 3). An anti-PAR1 antibody (ATAP2), which recognizes cleaved as well as intact PAR1 receptors, was used to detect PAR1 surface expression by flow cytometry.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal