Figure 1.
Antibody repertoire profiling on CFG and NCFGv2 reveals broad carbohydrate-recognition defects in symptomatic PADs. (A) Glycan-specific binding of serum IgG screened at 180 μg/mL on CFG glycan array version 5.1 (610 glycans) depicted as RFU. Screened sera were from cohorts with symptomatic HGG (n = 76), SPAD (n = 5), CVID (n = 25), CVID PPVlow (n = 6), or IgGSD (n = 8) or from HDs (n = 43). Significant values are reported (Kruskal-Wallis test). (B) Glycan-binding reactivity matrices for individual sera (HD, n = 12; SPAD, n = 5; IgGSD, n = 8; HGG, n = 11; CVID, n = 12) screened on the NCFGv2 and computed using the dendrogram clustering algorithm, as outlined in Materials and methods. Columns represent the antibody-reactivity profiles (reactivity of each specific glycan for the different sera samples), and the rows reflect the immune profiles for each patient subgroup based on the mean RFU values.

Antibody repertoire profiling on CFG and NCFGv2 reveals broad carbohydrate-recognition defects in symptomatic PADs. (A) Glycan-specific binding of serum IgG screened at 180 μg/mL on CFG glycan array version 5.1 (610 glycans) depicted as RFU. Screened sera were from cohorts with symptomatic HGG (n = 76), SPAD (n = 5), CVID (n = 25), CVID PPVlow (n = 6), or IgGSD (n = 8) or from HDs (n = 43). Significant values are reported (Kruskal-Wallis test). (B) Glycan-binding reactivity matrices for individual sera (HD, n = 12; SPAD, n = 5; IgGSD, n = 8; HGG, n = 11; CVID, n = 12) screened on the NCFGv2 and computed using the dendrogram clustering algorithm, as outlined in Materials and methods. Columns represent the antibody-reactivity profiles (reactivity of each specific glycan for the different sera samples), and the rows reflect the immune profiles for each patient subgroup based on the mean RFU values.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal