Figure 6
Figure 6. Enrichment of H3K79me2 on the Evi1 promoter of MLL-AF9–transformed cells. ChIP using (A) H3K79me2 and (B) H3K27me3 Abs showing enrichment of the H3K79me2 mark on the Evi1 promoter of Evi1pos vs Evi1neg clones. Conversely, the H3K27me3 mark is enriched on the Evi1 promoter of Evi1neg clones compared with Evi1pos MLL-AF9 clones. ChIP using H3K4me3, H3K79me2, and H3K27me3 Abs performed on 3 EVI1pos and 3 EVI1neg MLL-AF9 rearranged leukemias showed higher H3K79me2 marks present on the EVI1 promoter of EVI1pos MLL-AF9–rearranged human AMLs compared with EVI1neg cases. Q-PCRs were performed to monitor relative enrichment of each histone mark on the promoters of either (C) EVI1, (D) HoxA9 promoter, or (E) β-actin. Experiments show average relative enrichment with SD of either (A-B) 3 biologic replicates or (C-E) 2 independent ChIP pulldowns with triplicate Q-PCR measurements performed on the same cross-linked patient material.

Enrichment of H3K79me2 on the Evi1 promoter of MLL-AF9–transformed cells. ChIP using (A) H3K79me2 and (B) H3K27me3 Abs showing enrichment of the H3K79me2 mark on the Evi1 promoter of Evi1pos vs Evi1neg clones. Conversely, the H3K27me3 mark is enriched on the Evi1 promoter of Evi1neg clones compared with Evi1posMLL-AF9 clones. ChIP using H3K4me3, H3K79me2, and H3K27me3 Abs performed on 3 EVI1pos and 3 EVI1neg MLL-AF9 rearranged leukemias showed higher H3K79me2 marks present on the EVI1 promoter of EVI1pos MLL-AF9–rearranged human AMLs compared with EVI1neg cases. Q-PCRs were performed to monitor relative enrichment of each histone mark on the promoters of either (C) EVI1, (D) HoxA9 promoter, or (E) β-actin. Experiments show average relative enrichment with SD of either (A-B) 3 biologic replicates or (C-E) 2 independent ChIP pulldowns with triplicate Q-PCR measurements performed on the same cross-linked patient material.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal