Figure 7
Figure 7. Generation of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ iTregs from CD4+CD25−Foxp3− T cells by naturally occurring CD49b+CD200R3+ DCregs. (A-C) Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells (107/mouse) were transferred with or without OVAp/CD11c+ DCs, OVAp/CD49b+CD200R3− cells, or OVAp/CD49b+CD200R3+ cells (106/mouse) into mice. On day 8 after the adoptive transfer, Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells were isolated from the recipient mice. (A,B) The expression of CD25 and Foxp3 among gated KJ1-26+ T cells was analyzed by flow cytometry, and data are represented by a dot plot (A) and are percentage positive cells (B). *P < .01 compared with Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells and OVAp/CD11c+ DCs. Data are representative of 4 replicate experiments (A). Data are mean ± SEM, and the results are combined from 4 replicate experiments (B). (C) Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells (2 × 104) were cultured with splenocytes (2 × 104) plus anti-CD3ϵ mAb (1 μg/mL) in the presence of a graded dose (2.5 × 103-2 × 104) of Rag2+/+KJ1-26+CD25+ T cells or Rag2−/−KJ1-26+CD25+ T cells obtained from the adoptively transferred mice for 3 days, and the proliferative response was measured. *P < .01 compared with Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells. Data are mean ± SEM, and the results are combined from 4 replicate experiments. (D) Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells (2 × 106) were cultured with OVAp/CD11c+ DCs, OVAp/CD49b+CD200R3− cells, or OVAp/CD49b+CD200R3+ cells (2 × 105) in the presence or absence of TGF-β1 (0.1 ng/mL), anti–TGF-β mAb, anti-CD200R3 mAb, or control Ig (each 5 μg/mL) for 6 days, and the expression of CD25 and Foxp3 among gated KJ1-26+ T cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are represented by a dot plot, and numbers represent the percentage of CD25+Foxp3+ cells among gated KJ1-26+ T cells. Data are representative of 4 replicate experiments.

Generation of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ iTregs from CD4+CD25Foxp3 T cells by naturally occurring CD49b+CD200R3+ DCregs. (A-C) Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells (107/mouse) were transferred with or without OVAp/CD11c+ DCs, OVAp/CD49b+CD200R3 cells, or OVAp/CD49b+CD200R3+ cells (106/mouse) into mice. On day 8 after the adoptive transfer, Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells were isolated from the recipient mice. (A,B) The expression of CD25 and Foxp3 among gated KJ1-26+ T cells was analyzed by flow cytometry, and data are represented by a dot plot (A) and are percentage positive cells (B). *P < .01 compared with Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells and OVAp/CD11c+ DCs. Data are representative of 4 replicate experiments (A). Data are mean ± SEM, and the results are combined from 4 replicate experiments (B). (C) Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells (2 × 104) were cultured with splenocytes (2 × 104) plus anti-CD3ϵ mAb (1 μg/mL) in the presence of a graded dose (2.5 × 103-2 × 104) of Rag2+/+KJ1-26+CD25+ T cells or Rag2−/−KJ1-26+CD25+ T cells obtained from the adoptively transferred mice for 3 days, and the proliferative response was measured. *P < .01 compared with Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells. Data are mean ± SEM, and the results are combined from 4 replicate experiments. (D) Rag2−/−KJ1-26+ T cells (2 × 106) were cultured with OVAp/CD11c+ DCs, OVAp/CD49b+CD200R3 cells, or OVAp/CD49b+CD200R3+ cells (2 × 105) in the presence or absence of TGF-β1 (0.1 ng/mL), anti–TGF-β mAb, anti-CD200R3 mAb, or control Ig (each 5 μg/mL) for 6 days, and the expression of CD25 and Foxp3 among gated KJ1-26+ T cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are represented by a dot plot, and numbers represent the percentage of CD25+Foxp3+ cells among gated KJ1-26+ T cells. Data are representative of 4 replicate experiments.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal