Figure 1
Figure 1. Immunohistochemistry for JAK2 and p-STAT6. IHC for JAK2 with an lpHL case (A) and a tonsil (B) is shown. Inserts show higher magnifications of an L&H cell in panel A and the mantle zone/GC border in panel B. While JAK2 amounts in normal B cells were below the detection limit of IHC, 40 of 47 cases of lpHL showed positivity in L&H cells. (C) IHC with an lpHL case and a p-JAK2 specific antibody is shown. Fractions of L&H cells were positive in 13 of 33 analyzed cases. (D) IHC for p-STAT6 with an lpHL case is shown. Twenty-one of 43 analyzed lpHL cases showed positivity for p-STAT6. All cases were from the files of the Department of Pathology of the University of Frankfurt. Bound antibodies were detected using the Envision system (Dako, Hamburg, Germany) for anti-JAK2 and the CSAII signal amplification system for anti–p-JAK2 and anti–p-STAT6 with horseradish peroxidase and 3.3-diaminobenzidine as substrate. Specificity of antibodies was verified by comparison of IHC with Western blot analysis (JAK2 and p-STAT6; Figures S1,S2) and/or by the use of 2 different antibodies directed against the same antigen (JAK2 and p-JAK2). Specificity of anti–p-JAK2 and anti–p-STAT6 antibody for phosphorylated JAK2 and STAT6 was tested by pretreatment of several cases with T-cell phosphatase,5 which abolished staining completely (Figure S3). (E) Western blot analysis of JAK2 expression and activation in the lpHL-derived cell line DEV is shown. Whereas JAK2 was expressed in the MLBCL-derived cell line Karpas1106P, the cHL-derived cell line KMH2, and DEV, activation of JAK2 was observed only in Karpas1106P and DEV, in line with the presence of SOCS1 mutation only in Karpas1106P and DEV6.

Immunohistochemistry for JAK2 and p-STAT6. IHC for JAK2 with an lpHL case (A) and a tonsil (B) is shown. Inserts show higher magnifications of an L&H cell in panel A and the mantle zone/GC border in panel B. While JAK2 amounts in normal B cells were below the detection limit of IHC, 40 of 47 cases of lpHL showed positivity in L&H cells. (C) IHC with an lpHL case and a p-JAK2 specific antibody is shown. Fractions of L&H cells were positive in 13 of 33 analyzed cases. (D) IHC for p-STAT6 with an lpHL case is shown. Twenty-one of 43 analyzed lpHL cases showed positivity for p-STAT6. All cases were from the files of the Department of Pathology of the University of Frankfurt. Bound antibodies were detected using the Envision system (Dako, Hamburg, Germany) for anti-JAK2 and the CSAII signal amplification system for anti–p-JAK2 and anti–p-STAT6 with horseradish peroxidase and 3.3-diaminobenzidine as substrate. Specificity of antibodies was verified by comparison of IHC with Western blot analysis (JAK2 and p-STAT6; Figures S1,S2) and/or by the use of 2 different antibodies directed against the same antigen (JAK2 and p-JAK2). Specificity of anti–p-JAK2 and anti–p-STAT6 antibody for phosphorylated JAK2 and STAT6 was tested by pretreatment of several cases with T-cell phosphatase, which abolished staining completely (Figure S3). (E) Western blot analysis of JAK2 expression and activation in the lpHL-derived cell line DEV is shown. Whereas JAK2 was expressed in the MLBCL-derived cell line Karpas1106P, the cHL-derived cell line KMH2, and DEV, activation of JAK2 was observed only in Karpas1106P and DEV, in line with the presence of SOCS1 mutation only in Karpas1106P and DEV.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal