Figure 3
Figure 3. Clinical effect of lesions detected by SNP-A karyotyping analysis in combination with MC and new lesions detected by SNP-A regardless of MC results. Patients with new defects (red line) detected by the combination MC or SNP-A had worse OS (A), EFS (B), and PFS (C) than patients with no defects (black line) detected by both techniques. Patients with new lesions detected by SNP-A regardless of MC results showed worse OS (D), EFS (E), and PFS (F) than patients with an unchanged karyotype. In addition, SNP-A–identified lesions had an effect on OS in patients in the low-risk IPSS group (G) but not on EFS (H) and PFS (I). New SNP-A–detected defects did not affect outcomes in the high-risk IPSS group (J, K, and L). Tables represent the number at risk over time. Characteristics of censored patients have been presented in supplemental Table 4.

Clinical effect of lesions detected by SNP-A karyotyping analysis in combination with MC and new lesions detected by SNP-A regardless of MC results. Patients with new defects (red line) detected by the combination MC or SNP-A had worse OS (A), EFS (B), and PFS (C) than patients with no defects (black line) detected by both techniques. Patients with new lesions detected by SNP-A regardless of MC results showed worse OS (D), EFS (E), and PFS (F) than patients with an unchanged karyotype. In addition, SNP-A–identified lesions had an effect on OS in patients in the low-risk IPSS group (G) but not on EFS (H) and PFS (I). New SNP-A–detected defects did not affect outcomes in the high-risk IPSS group (J, K, and L). Tables represent the number at risk over time. Characteristics of censored patients have been presented in supplemental Table 4.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal