Figure 3
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier survival curves. OS (A) and RFS (B) in 121 CN-AML patients based on scoring system (P < .001 for both OS and RFS). CN-AML patients were grouped according to scoring system based on 4 prognostic markers (CEBPAdouble-mutation, NPM1/FLT3-ITD, WT1 mutation, and age). A score of βˆ’1 was assigned for each parameter associated with a favorable outcome (CEBPAdouble-mutation and NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDβˆ’) and a score of 1 for each factor associated with an adverse outcome (WT1 mutation and older age). The algebraic summation of these scores of each patient was the final score.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves. OS (A) and RFS (B) in 121 CN-AML patients based on scoring system (P < .001 for both OS and RFS). CN-AML patients were grouped according to scoring system based on 4 prognostic markers (CEBPAdouble-mutation, NPM1/FLT3-ITD, WT1 mutation, and age). A score of βˆ’1 was assigned for each parameter associated with a favorable outcome (CEBPAdouble-mutation and NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDβˆ’) and a score of 1 for each factor associated with an adverse outcome (WT1 mutation and older age). The algebraic summation of these scores of each patient was the final score.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal