Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Morphologic abnormalities in AMs of young Op/Op mice normalize with age. / (A-D) AMs from Op/Op mice or littermate controls were obtained by BAL, formed into sediments by cytocentrifugation, stained with Diff-Quick, and evaluated by light microscopy. (E-F) AM cell diameter was measured using Metamorph software. BAL cells consisted of more than 95% AMs in all mice, and they uniformly and strongly stained for Mac-3 antigen in samples from Op/Op mice (aged 20 ± 0 or 122 ± 14 days [A,C]) and littermate controls (aged 20 ± 0 or 120 ± 16 days [B,D]). In young mice, AM cell diameter was smaller in Op/Op mice than in littermate controls (105 106 cells counted in each group; P < .0001). In older mice,AM cell diameter in Op/Op and control mice was similar (107 118 cells counted in each group; P > .22) (× 100; insets, × 700).

Morphologic abnormalities in AMs of young Op/Op mice normalize with age.

(A-D) AMs from Op/Op mice or littermate controls were obtained by BAL, formed into sediments by cytocentrifugation, stained with Diff-Quick, and evaluated by light microscopy. (E-F) AM cell diameter was measured using Metamorph software. BAL cells consisted of more than 95% AMs in all mice, and they uniformly and strongly stained for Mac-3 antigen in samples from Op/Op mice (aged 20 ± 0 or 122 ± 14 days [A,C]) and littermate controls (aged 20 ± 0 or 120 ± 16 days [B,D]). In young mice, AM cell diameter was smaller in Op/Op mice than in littermate controls (105 106 cells counted in each group; P < .0001). In older mice,AM cell diameter in Op/Op and control mice was similar (107 118 cells counted in each group; P > .22) (× 100; insets, × 700).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal