Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Purity of the CD34+Lin−DR− population by double sorting. Shown are the representative data from one double-sorting experiment. (Left) Initial sort of the CD34-enriched population for CD34-SA670 and the FITC lymphoid cocktail (HLA-DR for the initial sort not shown). Cells were double sorted positive for surface CD34, lymphoid lineage negative, and HLA-DR negative/low. Reanalysis of all events (no exclusion by gating) after the second round of sorting is shown for CD34 and the lymphoid cocktail (middle) and for CD34 and HLA-DR (right). In each experiment, greater than 99.8% of events were within the CD34+Lin−(based on isotype controls) and CD34+DR−sort windows as shown. The 0.2% double-negative events were back gated and likely represent debris based on forward and side scatter analysis showing a majority of events (10 of 15 events for the example shown) were to the left of the lymphoid window (data not shown).

Purity of the CD34+LinDR population by double sorting. Shown are the representative data from one double-sorting experiment. (Left) Initial sort of the CD34-enriched population for CD34-SA670 and the FITC lymphoid cocktail (HLA-DR for the initial sort not shown). Cells were double sorted positive for surface CD34, lymphoid lineage negative, and HLA-DR negative/low. Reanalysis of all events (no exclusion by gating) after the second round of sorting is shown for CD34 and the lymphoid cocktail (middle) and for CD34 and HLA-DR (right). In each experiment, greater than 99.8% of events were within the CD34+Lin(based on isotype controls) and CD34+DRsort windows as shown. The 0.2% double-negative events were back gated and likely represent debris based on forward and side scatter analysis showing a majority of events (10 of 15 events for the example shown) were to the left of the lymphoid window (data not shown).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal