Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. GABP and PU.1 compete for binding to the mNE promoter ets site. (A) EMSA was performed with the mNE promoter probe and purified bacterially expressed GST-GABPα and GST-PU.1. Filled arrow, binding by GABPα (lanes 2 to 5). Addition of increasing amounts of PU.1 generated a new binding complex (open arrow, lanes 3 to 5) that competed with GABPα for the radiolabeled mNE promoter probe. No novel complex that might represent a direct physical interaction of GABPα and PU.1 was seen. (B) Open arrow indicates binding by PU.1 (lanes 2 to 5). Addition of increasing amounts of GABPα (filled arrow, lanes 3 to 5) competed with PU.1 for the radiolabeled mNE promoter probe.

GABP and PU.1 compete for binding to the mNE promoter ets site. (A) EMSA was performed with the mNE promoter probe and purified bacterially expressed GST-GABPα and GST-PU.1. Filled arrow, binding by GABPα (lanes 2 to 5). Addition of increasing amounts of PU.1 generated a new binding complex (open arrow, lanes 3 to 5) that competed with GABPα for the radiolabeled mNE promoter probe. No novel complex that might represent a direct physical interaction of GABPα and PU.1 was seen. (B) Open arrow indicates binding by PU.1 (lanes 2 to 5). Addition of increasing amounts of GABPα (filled arrow, lanes 3 to 5) competed with PU.1 for the radiolabeled mNE promoter probe.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal