Figure 3.
Figure 3. BCAP−/− HSPCs are primed for monocyte differentiation in the steady state. (A) Absolute numbers of LSK (left) and CMP, GMP, and MEP (right) cells in lineage− (Lin−) BM of WT and BCAP−/− mice. Data are pooled from 4 independent experiments, with n = 16 mice per group. (B) A total of 100 000 LSK, 120 000 CMP, or 120 000 GMP cells were sorted from Lin− BM of 3 pooled WT or BCAP−/− mice. Messenger RNA (mRNA) was isolated from sorted cells and reverse transcribed into complementary DNA. Relative expression of mRNA encoding Pu.1, C/EBPα, and IRF8 was determined by qRT-PCR from WT and BCAP−/− LSK, CMP, and GMP cells. Transcription factor expression was normalized to HPRT expression and shown as arbitrary units; graphs show mean + standard deviation; data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 mice per group. (C) Representative flow plots of intranuclear staining for IRF8 or isotype control antibody in WT and BCAP−/− LSK, CMP, and GMP cells. (D) Frequencies of IRF8+ cells and mean fluorescence index (MFI) for IRF8 staining in WT and BCAP−/− IRF8+ LSK, CMP, and GMP cells. In panels C and D, data are representative of 2 independent experiments. Graphs show mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), with n = 5 mice per group. (E) Representative flow plots of GMP subsets identified by Ly6C and CD115 expression. GMPs were gated as in supplemental Figure 2 and then early GMP (Ly6C−CD115− GMP), GP (Ly6C+CD115− GMP), and MP (Ly6C+CD115+ GMP) cells were identified as shown. (F) Frequencies of early GMP, GP, and MP cells within the GMP population; data are pooled from 3 independent experiments, with n = 10 mice per group. For all graphs, data show mean ± SEM; each symbol represents data from an individual mouse. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001, and ****P< .0001, as determined by 2-tailed, unpaired Student t test.

BCAP−/− HSPCs are primed for monocyte differentiation in the steady state. (A) Absolute numbers of LSK (left) and CMP, GMP, and MEP (right) cells in lineage (Lin) BM of WT and BCAP−/− mice. Data are pooled from 4 independent experiments, with n = 16 mice per group. (B) A total of 100 000 LSK, 120 000 CMP, or 120 000 GMP cells were sorted from Lin BM of 3 pooled WT or BCAP−/− mice. Messenger RNA (mRNA) was isolated from sorted cells and reverse transcribed into complementary DNA. Relative expression of mRNA encoding Pu.1, C/EBPα, and IRF8 was determined by qRT-PCR from WT and BCAP−/− LSK, CMP, and GMP cells. Transcription factor expression was normalized to HPRT expression and shown as arbitrary units; graphs show mean + standard deviation; data are representative of 3 independent experiments with n = 3 mice per group. (C) Representative flow plots of intranuclear staining for IRF8 or isotype control antibody in WT and BCAP−/− LSK, CMP, and GMP cells. (D) Frequencies of IRF8+ cells and mean fluorescence index (MFI) for IRF8 staining in WT and BCAP−/− IRF8+ LSK, CMP, and GMP cells. In panels C and D, data are representative of 2 independent experiments. Graphs show mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), with n = 5 mice per group. (E) Representative flow plots of GMP subsets identified by Ly6C and CD115 expression. GMPs were gated as in supplemental Figure 2 and then early GMP (Ly6CCD115 GMP), GP (Ly6C+CD115 GMP), and MP (Ly6C+CD115+ GMP) cells were identified as shown. (F) Frequencies of early GMP, GP, and MP cells within the GMP population; data are pooled from 3 independent experiments, with n = 10 mice per group. For all graphs, data show mean ± SEM; each symbol represents data from an individual mouse. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001, and ****P< .0001, as determined by 2-tailed, unpaired Student t test.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal