Figure 1
Figure 1. Focused chemical genetic screen reveals sensitivity of FLT3-mutant AML cell lines to several FDA-approved compounds. (A) Heat map shows treatment response of FLT3-ITD (MOLM-14 and MV4-11) or FLT3 wild-type (WT) (THP-1, ML-2, KU812, and K562) leukemic cells. Viability measurements were conducted by the CellTiterGlo (CTG) Viability Assay. For full data set, see supplemental Figure 1A. Blue, sensitivity; red, resistance. (B) Significance of viability difference between FLT3 WT and ITD+ cells upon drug exposure. (C) Dose-response curve of ITD+ (red) or control (black) leukemic cells with CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. Cells were incubated with increasing concentrations for 72 hours. Cell viability and proliferation were assessed by using the CTG assay. IC50 values were calculated by using GraphPad Prism software. Error bars indicate ± SEM.

Focused chemical genetic screen reveals sensitivity of FLT3-mutant AML cell lines to several FDA-approved compounds. (A) Heat map shows treatment response of FLT3-ITD (MOLM-14 and MV4-11) or FLT3 wild-type (WT) (THP-1, ML-2, KU812, and K562) leukemic cells. Viability measurements were conducted by the CellTiterGlo (CTG) Viability Assay. For full data set, see supplemental Figure 1A. Blue, sensitivity; red, resistance. (B) Significance of viability difference between FLT3 WT and ITD+ cells upon drug exposure. (C) Dose-response curve of ITD+ (red) or control (black) leukemic cells with CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. Cells were incubated with increasing concentrations for 72 hours. Cell viability and proliferation were assessed by using the CTG assay. IC50 values were calculated by using GraphPad Prism software. Error bars indicate ± SEM.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal