Figure 3
Figure 3. Clustering of BCR and DC-SIGN in FL B cells. Sorted CD44−IgD− GC B cells and purified IgM+ FL B cells were incubated with unlabeled rhDC-SIGN before incubation on fibronectin-coated glass and fixation. DC-SIGN was revealed using mouse IgG2b anti-human DC-SIGN primary mAb and A488-donkey anti-mouse IgG2b secondary Ab whereas IgM+ cells were directly stained using A549-goat anti-IgM Ab. One example highlighting DC-SIGN/BCR colocalization is shown in panel A. Scale bar, 2.5 µM. The DC-SIGN:IgM rMFI was obtained for 100 cells per sample in 3 pooled GC B-cell samples, 6 IgM+ Lo-B FL samples (FL1, FL6-10), and 4 IgM+ Hi-B FL samples (FL3, FL5, FL11, FL12) (B). The Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test followed by the Dunn posttest was used to compare FL samples with GC-M samples; ***P < .0001.

Clustering of BCR and DC-SIGN in FL B cells. Sorted CD44IgD GC B cells and purified IgM+ FL B cells were incubated with unlabeled rhDC-SIGN before incubation on fibronectin-coated glass and fixation. DC-SIGN was revealed using mouse IgG2b anti-human DC-SIGN primary mAb and A488-donkey anti-mouse IgG2b secondary Ab whereas IgM+ cells were directly stained using A549-goat anti-IgM Ab. One example highlighting DC-SIGN/BCR colocalization is shown in panel A. Scale bar, 2.5 µM. The DC-SIGN:IgM rMFI was obtained for 100 cells per sample in 3 pooled GC B-cell samples, 6 IgM+ Lo-B FL samples (FL1, FL6-10), and 4 IgM+ Hi-B FL samples (FL3, FL5, FL11, FL12) (B). The Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test followed by the Dunn posttest was used to compare FL samples with GC-M samples; ***P < .0001.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal