Figure 2
Figure 2. Examples of detecting MRD with “different-from-normal approach” applied to myeloblast population. (A) AML patient undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant with no prior flow cytometric data available to identify diagnostic LAIP; however, pretransplant bone marrow CD34+ myeloblasts (defined by gating using CD34+/CD117+/CD45/SSC/FSC parameters) include a clearly aberrant CD34+CD33+CD56+ leukemic population and therefore are MRD-positive (0.05% of BM-nucleated cells). This patient relapsed with the same aberrant phenotype. (B) Examples of 2 AML patients (AML-1, AML-2) monitored for MRD during chemotherapy using data overlay with a control sample to detect “different-from-normal” blast subpopulations in CD117+ myeloblasts (defined by gating using CD117+/CD45/ SSC/FSC parameters). Green, CD117+ myeloblasts of control bone marrow; red, CD117+ myeloblasts of patient’s bone marrow; blue, emerging aberrant leukemic subpopulation within empty space; empty space, region in which there are very few or no normal cells. (AML-1) CD34 vs HLADR plots shown of CD117+ blasts. Presentation sample was hemodilute with no definite LAIP (other markers not shown). Postcourse 1 sample had a small number of cells in an empty space (CD34+HLADRlow, in blue) but categorized as insufficient to define as MRD without a diagnostic LAIP; however, the postcourse 2 sample had obvious MRD within the same empty space. (AML-2) CD33 vs CD13 plot shown of CD117+ blasts. Change in leukemic immunophenotype with MRD postcourse 3 from an emerging new aberrant subpopulation in an empty space (CD33+CD13low, in blue). This patient relapsed with the same aberrant phenotype but the diagnostic LAIPs were not present (including from other markers not shown).

Examples of detecting MRD with “different-from-normal approach” applied to myeloblast population. (A) AML patient undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplant with no prior flow cytometric data available to identify diagnostic LAIP; however, pretransplant bone marrow CD34+ myeloblasts (defined by gating using CD34+/CD117+/CD45/SSC/FSC parameters) include a clearly aberrant CD34+CD33+CD56+ leukemic population and therefore are MRD-positive (0.05% of BM-nucleated cells). This patient relapsed with the same aberrant phenotype. (B) Examples of 2 AML patients (AML-1, AML-2) monitored for MRD during chemotherapy using data overlay with a control sample to detect “different-from-normal” blast subpopulations in CD117+ myeloblasts (defined by gating using CD117+/CD45/ SSC/FSC parameters). Green, CD117+ myeloblasts of control bone marrow; red, CD117+ myeloblasts of patient’s bone marrow; blue, emerging aberrant leukemic subpopulation within empty space; empty space, region in which there are very few or no normal cells. (AML-1) CD34 vs HLADR plots shown of CD117+ blasts. Presentation sample was hemodilute with no definite LAIP (other markers not shown). Postcourse 1 sample had a small number of cells in an empty space (CD34+HLADRlow, in blue) but categorized as insufficient to define as MRD without a diagnostic LAIP; however, the postcourse 2 sample had obvious MRD within the same empty space. (AML-2) CD33 vs CD13 plot shown of CD117+ blasts. Change in leukemic immunophenotype with MRD postcourse 3 from an emerging new aberrant subpopulation in an empty space (CD33+CD13low, in blue). This patient relapsed with the same aberrant phenotype but the diagnostic LAIPs were not present (including from other markers not shown).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal