Figure 7
Figure 7. IVIg-mediated COX-2 induction and PGE2 production in DCs are F(ab′)2 dependent. (A,D) Western-blot analysis of COX-2 expression in DCs. DCs were cultured in GM-CSF and IL-4 alone (Ctr) or with IVIg or equimolar concentrations of either F(ab′)2 fragments or Fc fragments of IVIg or HSA for 24 hours (A). In some experiments, DCs were preincubated with blocking antibodies to DC-SIGN or isotype control antibodies followed by treatment with equimolar concentrations of either IVIg or F(ab′)2 fragment of IVIg (D). Representative blot of 6 to 7 experiments is shown. (B,E) The fold changes in the COX-2 expression (mean ± SEM, n = 6-7) based on densitometry analysis of western blots in the above experiments. AU, arbitrary units. (C) Secretion (mean ± SEM, n = 7) of PGE2 by DC that were treated as explained above, *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.

IVIg-mediated COX-2 induction and PGE2production in DCs are F(ab′)2dependent. (A,D) Western-blot analysis of COX-2 expression in DCs. DCs were cultured in GM-CSF and IL-4 alone (Ctr) or with IVIg or equimolar concentrations of either F(ab′)2 fragments or Fc fragments of IVIg or HSA for 24 hours (A). In some experiments, DCs were preincubated with blocking antibodies to DC-SIGN or isotype control antibodies followed by treatment with equimolar concentrations of either IVIg or F(ab′)2 fragment of IVIg (D). Representative blot of 6 to 7 experiments is shown. (B,E) The fold changes in the COX-2 expression (mean ± SEM, n = 6-7) based on densitometry analysis of western blots in the above experiments. AU, arbitrary units. (C) Secretion (mean ± SEM, n = 7) of PGE2 by DC that were treated as explained above, *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal