Figure 6
Figure 6. Serum but not pIgG treatment of unaffected young AID−/−µS−/− mice corrects extra numbers of total, MZ, and B1 cells but does not correct GC B cells at adulthood. Three-week-old Thy1.2+ AID−/−µS−/− mice intravenously received either 800 μg of pIgG or mIgG weekly, or 200 μL of sera from WT mice every other day (sera). Four weeks after the first injection, these 3 groups of treated mice together with untreated age-matched AID−/−µS−/− and WT controls were analyzed. (A) FACS analysis of BM of 3-week-old WT and AID−/−µS−/− mice. The numbers in dot plots show the percentages of B220+CD43− cells in fractions D (B220dimIgM−), E (B220dimIgM+), and F (B220brightIgM+). (B) Total number of splenic CD19+IgM+ B cells of 3-week-old AID−/−µS−/− and age-matched WT controls. (C) Levels of serum IgG in mice treated with pIgG or mIgG were monitored by ELISA performed on blood samples withdrawn just before each of the 4 injections. The x axis indicates WT age-matched mice and for each group of treated mice, the time after the first injection, in weeks 1 to 4. (D) Levels of IgM and IgGs in mice treated with WT sera at the time of the analysis. (E) The total numbers of CD19+IgM+ B cells per spleen of untreated WT and AID−/−µS−/− mice or treated AID−/−µS−/− mice. (F) Absolute numbers of Imm, Mat, follicular (FO), MZ, CD21loCD23lo, and GC B cells per spleen of untreated and treated mice. (G) Representative dot plots showing the percentages of GC B cells among mature splenic B cells of untreated WT and AID−/−µS−/− mice, or treated AID−/−µS−/− mice. Each dot represents one mouse. Results are from 2 independent experiments; ns, not significant; *P ≤ .05; **P ≤ .01; ***P ≤ .005.

Serum but not pIgG treatment of unaffected young AID−/−µS−/− mice corrects extra numbers of total, MZ, and B1 cells but does not correct GC B cells at adulthood. Three-week-old Thy1.2+ AID−/−µS−/− mice intravenously received either 800 μg of pIgG or mIgG weekly, or 200 μL of sera from WT mice every other day (sera). Four weeks after the first injection, these 3 groups of treated mice together with untreated age-matched AID−/−µS−/− and WT controls were analyzed. (A) FACS analysis of BM of 3-week-old WT and AID−/−µS−/− mice. The numbers in dot plots show the percentages of B220+CD43 cells in fractions D (B220dimIgM), E (B220dimIgM+), and F (B220brightIgM+). (B) Total number of splenic CD19+IgM+ B cells of 3-week-old AID−/−µS−/− and age-matched WT controls. (C) Levels of serum IgG in mice treated with pIgG or mIgG were monitored by ELISA performed on blood samples withdrawn just before each of the 4 injections. The x axis indicates WT age-matched mice and for each group of treated mice, the time after the first injection, in weeks 1 to 4. (D) Levels of IgM and IgGs in mice treated with WT sera at the time of the analysis. (E) The total numbers of CD19+IgM+ B cells per spleen of untreated WT and AID−/−µS−/− mice or treated AID−/−µS−/− mice. (F) Absolute numbers of Imm, Mat, follicular (FO), MZ, CD21loCD23lo, and GC B cells per spleen of untreated and treated mice. (G) Representative dot plots showing the percentages of GC B cells among mature splenic B cells of untreated WT and AID−/−µS−/− mice, or treated AID−/−µS−/− mice. Each dot represents one mouse. Results are from 2 independent experiments; ns, not significant; *P ≤ .05; **P ≤ .01; ***P ≤ .005.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal