Figure 4
Figure 4. Effect of IFNα treatment on LT-HSC cell cycle in chimeric transplant recipients and primary mice. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing cell cycle in lineagelowKithighSca1+CD150+ WT (CD45.1) or Jak2VF (CD45.2) LT-HSCs from chimeric recipient mice. G0 (quiescent) cells are Ki-67lowH333422n, G1 cells are Ki-67+H333422n, and SG2M cells are Ki67+H333424n. (B) Reduction in quiescent HSCs after IFNα treatment in WT (gated on CD45.1 WT vehicle: 40.3 ± 6.6% vs IFNα: 22.4 ± 6.0%; P < .01; n = 4) and reduction in quiescent HSCs after IFNα treatment in Jak2VF (gated on CD45.2 Jak2VF, vehicle: 28.0 ± 2.3% vs IFNα: 5.4 ± 0.7%; P < .0001; n = 5). There were significantly fewer quiescent Jak2VF compared with WT HSCs (1.4-fold; P = .02). More profound depletion of quiescent Jak2VF HSC compared with WT HSCs (4.2 fold; P = .0003). (C) Increase in actively cycling (Ki67+H333424n) HSCs after IFNα treatment in Jak2VF cells (gated on CD45.1 WT vehicle: 19.6 ± 0.4% vs WT IFNα: 24.2 ± 6.5%; P = .21; gated on CD45.2 Jak2VF vehicle: 24.1 ± 0.9% vs Jak2VF IFNα: 35.9 ± 9.6%; P < .05; n = 4-5). There were significantly more Jak2VF than WT HSCs in active cell cycle in vehicle-treated recipients (1.2-fold; P < .01) and also in IFNα-treated recipients (1.5-fold; P = .05). Each data point represents an individual mouse. Data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments using chimeric recipient mice. Similar results were found in each experiment. Results given are mean ± standard deviation. (D) GSEA performed on lineagelowKithighSca1+CD150+ WT (CD45.1) or Jak2VF (CD45.2) cells from chimeric recipient mice revealed that genes regulating cell cycle were enriched in Jak2VF HSCs compared with WT HSCs. (E) Genes regulating quiescence were relatively enriched in WT HSCs compared with Jak2VF HSCs. (F) Reduction in quiescent (Ki67lowH333422n) HSCs in WT and Jak2VF primary mice after IFNα treatment (WT vehicle: 31.0 ± 3.2% vs WT IFNα: 21.7 ± 4.9%; P = .16; Jak2VF vehicle: 22.0 ± 3.6% vs Jak2VF IFNα: 11.1 ± 0.9%; P = .05; n = 3-4/group). (G) Increase in actively cycling (Ki67+H333424n) HSCs in WT and Jak2VF primary mice after IFNα treatment (WT vehicle: 20.0 ± 1.1% vs WT IFNα: 31.7 ± 2.6%; P < .01; Jak2VF vehicle: 30.1 ± 1.6% vs Jak2VF IFNα: 41.3 ± 1.4%; P < .01; n = 3-4/group). There were significantly more Jak2VF than WT HSCs in active cell cycle in vehicle-treated recipients (P < .01) and also in IFNα-treated recipients (P = .03).

Effect of IFNα treatment on LT-HSC cell cycle in chimeric transplant recipients and primary mice. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing cell cycle in lineagelowKithighSca1+CD150+ WT (CD45.1) or Jak2VF (CD45.2) LT-HSCs from chimeric recipient mice. G0 (quiescent) cells are Ki-67lowH333422n, G1 cells are Ki-67+H333422n, and SG2M cells are Ki67+H333424n. (B) Reduction in quiescent HSCs after IFNα treatment in WT (gated on CD45.1 WT vehicle: 40.3 ± 6.6% vs IFNα: 22.4 ± 6.0%; P < .01; n = 4) and reduction in quiescent HSCs after IFNα treatment in Jak2VF (gated on CD45.2 Jak2VF, vehicle: 28.0 ± 2.3% vs IFNα: 5.4 ± 0.7%; P < .0001; n = 5). There were significantly fewer quiescent Jak2VF compared with WT HSCs (1.4-fold; P = .02). More profound depletion of quiescent Jak2VF HSC compared with WT HSCs (4.2 fold; P = .0003). (C) Increase in actively cycling (Ki67+H333424n) HSCs after IFNα treatment in Jak2VF cells (gated on CD45.1 WT vehicle: 19.6 ± 0.4% vs WT IFNα: 24.2 ± 6.5%; P = .21; gated on CD45.2 Jak2VF vehicle: 24.1 ± 0.9% vs Jak2VF IFNα: 35.9 ± 9.6%; P < .05; n = 4-5). There were significantly more Jak2VF than WT HSCs in active cell cycle in vehicle-treated recipients (1.2-fold; P < .01) and also in IFNα-treated recipients (1.5-fold; P = .05). Each data point represents an individual mouse. Data shown are representative of at least 2 independent experiments using chimeric recipient mice. Similar results were found in each experiment. Results given are mean ± standard deviation. (D) GSEA performed on lineagelowKithighSca1+CD150+ WT (CD45.1) or Jak2VF (CD45.2) cells from chimeric recipient mice revealed that genes regulating cell cycle were enriched in Jak2VF HSCs compared with WT HSCs. (E) Genes regulating quiescence were relatively enriched in WT HSCs compared with Jak2VF HSCs. (F) Reduction in quiescent (Ki67lowH333422n) HSCs in WT and Jak2VF primary mice after IFNα treatment (WT vehicle: 31.0 ± 3.2% vs WT IFNα: 21.7 ± 4.9%; P = .16; Jak2VF vehicle: 22.0 ± 3.6% vs Jak2VF IFNα: 11.1 ± 0.9%; P = .05; n = 3-4/group). (G) Increase in actively cycling (Ki67+H333424n) HSCs in WT and Jak2VF primary mice after IFNα treatment (WT vehicle: 20.0 ± 1.1% vs WT IFNα: 31.7 ± 2.6%; P < .01; Jak2VF vehicle: 30.1 ± 1.6% vs Jak2VF IFNα: 41.3 ± 1.4%; P < .01; n = 3-4/group). There were significantly more Jak2VF than WT HSCs in active cell cycle in vehicle-treated recipients (P < .01) and also in IFNα-treated recipients (P = .03).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal