Figure 3
Figure 3. Increased initial oxidative DNA damage to the promoters of antioxidant genes in FA cells. (A) Repair kinetics of oxidative damage to GPX1 promoter. FA-A cells or gene-corrected cells were treated with H2O2 for 2 hours and released for the indicated time intervals followed by genomic DNA or RNA isolation. Samples were then subjected to (left) DNA-damage assay or (right) RT-PCR. (B) Repair kinetics of oxidative damage to GSTP1 promoter. Samples described in panel A were then subjected to (left) DNA-damage assay or (right) RT-PCR. Percentage of intact DNA is the ratio of PCR products after Fpg cleavage to those present in uncleaved DNA. (C) Increased initial oxidative DNA damage in FA-A cells. Cells described in panel A were used for ChIP using an Ab against 8-oxodG and PCR using primers specific for (left) GPX1 or (right) GSTP1 promoter. Representative images (top) and quantifications (bottom) are shown. Results are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. (D) Repair efficiency as determined by host cell-reactivation assay. The pSSG-promoter reporter vector containing promoter regions of antioxidant gene GCLC, GPX1, GSTP1, or TXNRD1, as well as control gene GAPDH or β-tubulin, were treated with 100μM H2O2 for 1 hour in vitro and then transfected into normal, FA-A, or gene-corrected fibroblasts followed by determination of luciferase activity. Results are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. (E) Repair kinetics of oxidative damage to naked promoter DNA. Genomic DNA was isolated from cells described in panel D followed by Fpg cleavage and qPCR using primers specific for the cloned GPX1 promoter. The level of intact DNA represents the efficiency of repair.

Increased initial oxidative DNA damage to the promoters of antioxidant genes in FA cells. (A) Repair kinetics of oxidative damage to GPX1 promoter. FA-A cells or gene-corrected cells were treated with H2O2 for 2 hours and released for the indicated time intervals followed by genomic DNA or RNA isolation. Samples were then subjected to (left) DNA-damage assay or (right) RT-PCR. (B) Repair kinetics of oxidative damage to GSTP1 promoter. Samples described in panel A were then subjected to (left) DNA-damage assay or (right) RT-PCR. Percentage of intact DNA is the ratio of PCR products after Fpg cleavage to those present in uncleaved DNA. (C) Increased initial oxidative DNA damage in FA-A cells. Cells described in panel A were used for ChIP using an Ab against 8-oxodG and PCR using primers specific for (left) GPX1 or (right) GSTP1 promoter. Representative images (top) and quantifications (bottom) are shown. Results are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. (D) Repair efficiency as determined by host cell-reactivation assay. The pSSG-promoter reporter vector containing promoter regions of antioxidant gene GCLC, GPX1, GSTP1, or TXNRD1, as well as control gene GAPDH or β-tubulin, were treated with 100μM H2O2 for 1 hour in vitro and then transfected into normal, FA-A, or gene-corrected fibroblasts followed by determination of luciferase activity. Results are means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. (E) Repair kinetics of oxidative damage to naked promoter DNA. Genomic DNA was isolated from cells described in panel D followed by Fpg cleavage and qPCR using primers specific for the cloned GPX1 promoter. The level of intact DNA represents the efficiency of repair.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal