Figure 3
Figure 3. An independent AML cohort confirmed the positive effect of high BRE expression on prognosis. (A) BRE expression was high in a subset of a second cohort of 436 AML patients and co-occurred highly with MLL-AF9 translocations (P < .001 based on Fisher exact tests). cDNA (40k) expression array data of BRE (clone: IMAGE:739993) were log transformed and mean centered. Patients were subdivided into 3 groups based on MLL-AF9 and 11q23 positivity. Dotted lines represent the mean of all AML samples plus 3 or 4× the SD of BRE expression, used as values for outlier analysis and cutoff for high BRE expression, assigning 7 or 3 samples with high expression, respectively. (B) High BRE expression accounts for good OS within an independent MLL-AF9 cohort (5-year OS of 7.1 ± 6.9 vs 63.6 ± 14.5%, P = .0089 for patients with normal and high BRE expression, respectively). BRE array expression data of 2 cohorts of MLL-AF9–positive patients were combined by log transformation and mean centering of the data. Based on the cutoff used for high BRE expression in panel A (mean of 436 AML samples + 3 × SD), MLL-AF9 patients were subdivided into 2 groups: high and normal BRE expression (see supplemental Table 2). P values were determined with the log-rank test. The number of patients included in the analyses is shown in brackets.

An independent AML cohort confirmed the positive effect of high BRE expression on prognosis. (A) BRE expression was high in a subset of a second cohort of 436 AML patients and co-occurred highly with MLL-AF9 translocations (P < .001 based on Fisher exact tests). cDNA (40k) expression array data of BRE (clone: IMAGE:739993) were log transformed and mean centered. Patients were subdivided into 3 groups based on MLL-AF9 and 11q23 positivity. Dotted lines represent the mean of all AML samples plus 3 or 4× the SD of BRE expression, used as values for outlier analysis and cutoff for high BRE expression, assigning 7 or 3 samples with high expression, respectively. (B) High BRE expression accounts for good OS within an independent MLL-AF9 cohort (5-year OS of 7.1 ± 6.9 vs 63.6 ± 14.5%, P = .0089 for patients with normal and high BRE expression, respectively). BRE array expression data of 2 cohorts of MLL-AF9–positive patients were combined by log transformation and mean centering of the data. Based on the cutoff used for high BRE expression in panel A (mean of 436 AML samples + 3 × SD), MLL-AF9 patients were subdivided into 2 groups: high and normal BRE expression (see supplemental Table 2). P values were determined with the log-rank test. The number of patients included in the analyses is shown in brackets.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal