Figure 4
Figure 4. Effect of U0126 on MYC induction. Cells were stimulated with anti-IgM for 3 hours in the presence of U0126 (10μM) or DMSO as a control. (A) Expression of MYC and phosphorylated and total ERK1/2 was analyzed by immunoblotting. Two representative samples are shown of a total of 5 samples analyzed. Note that intervening lanes were removed for clarity, and the complete blot is shown in supplemental Figure 1D. (B) Quantitation of MYC expression. Graphs show mean (± SEM) MYC expression relative to untreated cells (set to 1.0), derived from 5 independent experiments. The reduction in MYC expression in cells treated with anti-IgM and U0126 was statistically significant compared with cells treated with anti-IgM alone (Student matched pairs t test).

Effect of U0126 on MYC induction. Cells were stimulated with anti-IgM for 3 hours in the presence of U0126 (10μM) or DMSO as a control. (A) Expression of MYC and phosphorylated and total ERK1/2 was analyzed by immunoblotting. Two representative samples are shown of a total of 5 samples analyzed. Note that intervening lanes were removed for clarity, and the complete blot is shown in supplemental Figure 1D. (B) Quantitation of MYC expression. Graphs show mean (± SEM) MYC expression relative to untreated cells (set to 1.0), derived from 5 independent experiments. The reduction in MYC expression in cells treated with anti-IgM and U0126 was statistically significant compared with cells treated with anti-IgM alone (Student matched pairs t test).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal